ParentageWikiProject Pterosaurs is a descendant of WikiProject Tree of Life.
Descendant WikiprojectsCurrently, no descendant WikiProjects have been defined. However, if you would like to create one, please feel free to. Related WikiProjectsParticipantsIf you would like to be a part of this project, please add your name to the list below:
Open list of tasksBelow is a list of open tasks that the project is currently working on. If you feel like you could help with the task, place your name below it by typing ~~~. Also, if you would like to post a task for others to look at, post it below or on the project talk page. If you feel a request has been fixed, please scratch it off the list, but do not delete it. Do not feel urged to place your name under every open task. All members and non-members are also encouraged to elaborate on any existing article or stub, so long as the information provided is correct and current, with appropriate sources provided. If you are in doubt about your information, post it on the project talk page for it to be read over. TasksPlease add new tasks to the bottom.
GoalsThe main goal of WikiProject Pterosaurs is to create and gather better information and articles on pterosaurs. Important tasks always include expanding and cleaning up articles, adding taxoboxes and standardising all articles. Useful links
Criteria for inclusionArticles should not get any more specific than genus level. Individual species should be discussed in the article about the appropriate genus. "Significant" higher order taxa should also get their own pages. Article titlesThe titles of all articles about individual genera should be composed simply of the scientific generic name (see next section), except where the name is preoccupied. The titles of all articles about higher level taxa should consist of the common name of the group (see next section), with a redirect for the formal scientific name, or vice versa. This way both formal and common names will lead to the same article. Image Use GuidelinesGeneral guideline for image use: Any image that is anatomically accurate within known constraints. Criteria for removing an image:
Pterosaur taxa namesSpeciesWhen a species is mentioned (on its own page or another), the scientific binomial name should at least be mentioned once. After this, the genus name or common name can be used. Do not use common names too much, they look amateuristic. If you use them, realise that you are referring to the genus, or to an order ending on -ia. For example pterodactyl can be used for Pterodactylus or for Pterodactyl. Even more informally it can refer to the family, as equivalent to pterodactyloid. Inconsequential use confuses the reader. Plurals: Best use common names, as they may be pluralised in English : e.g. 45 pterodactyls, but never 45 pterodactyluses. Don't pluralise scientific (Latin) names in an English way: Quetzalcoatluses is wrong. Quetzalcoatluses is correct, but now you are meaning several species belonging to the genus Quetzalcoatlus, some of which you don't recognize. It may sound strange, but "Sarah is attacked by lots of Quetzalcoatlus and 3 Pterodactylus" is the correct way. The same applies to pluralising binomial names: "John was stampeded by a large herd of Quetzalcoatlus northropi and 5 Pterodactylus suprejurensis". There is no change. Don't use binomials in this case unless you want to confer that the identification of the species is very important. Higher order taxaThe formal names of all groupings higher than genus are capitalised, never italicised. If fitting the situation, common names are preferrable. These are in lowercase. Example: "Dsungaripterus is a genus of Pterosaur" sounds a lot better than "Dsungaripterus is a sauropsid genus belonging to the [[Pterosaur|Pterosauria]". The same applies to other higher-order taxa. Note that a pterodactyl belongs to the genus Pterodactylus, while a pterodactyloid belongs to the family Pterodactylidae. CategoriesTemplates
Good sites (technical)The following sites provide some scholarly information on dinosaurs, but are not primary sources. Most are actually tertiary sources, so information may or may not always be complete, current, and/or accurate.
Primary ReferencesThe best source for accurate information on pterosaurs is the primary literature, where original research is published. After you get a basic feel for the terminology, it becomes possible to learn by immersion by reading articles and trying to piece together what the authors are saying. A big problem, however, is access. Finding a copy of a journal can be difficult, and making copies can really add up. Subscriptions are usually obscenely expensive because most of these journals have pretty low circulation. So how do you get a hold of technical papers? Most scientific journals now offer PDFs of their articles online. Unfortunately, you are usually required to subscribe to the journal, pay a bunch of money, or go to a library that subscribes to the journal in order to access them. If you do live near a university or public library, it is not a bad idea to find out what journals they subscribe to and then spend a few hours in the library downloading PDF files and emailing them to yourself... it's a lot cheaper than making copies. However, if you don't have that kind of time or don't live near a major library, there are still a lot of places to find papers online for free, which some of you may already know about. But I'll list some of the ones I know about here: Journals
Individual Researchers
Other Sites
I'm sure other people know of other places to get articles. Please add them to the appropriate section above, as long as they are legal. Google searches or searching for "pdf" on the Archives of the Dinosaur Mailing List might also nab you some more. Credit where credit is dueThis project page was pretty much taken from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs page, and they have our grateful thanks for having done the original work we have so artlessly taken from them. Animals project proposalI think it's both a pity and somewhat illogical that we have no animal WikiProject despite the fact that there are over 20 projects that are basically its daughters. There are also other projects that could emerge from it in the future, such as one on animal behavior. The project would provide a central place for people from all animal projects to talk, a central set of guidelines for articles on animals and zoology, and an assessment system for articles related to animals. If you are interested in creating such a project please visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of life#Animals project to discuss. Richard001 08:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC) The following projects would come under the parentage of this project:
| |