User talk:Yamanbaiia
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "User_talk:Yamanbaiia".

content
This user has only seen 14/17 Bab films :(
This user is VILE!!!
(and likes hugs and senseless userboxes!)

/Archive 2007

Cite news: {{cite news |first= |last= |publisher= |title= |page= |date= |accessdate=2008-10-06|url= }}

Contents

Reverted edit on Jonathan Pryce page

This is the official myspace profile of Jonathan Pryce. I added it as he doesn't currently have an official .com, etc. website that I am aware of. If so, then that one can be used as the link then. 69.133.89.131 (talk) 02:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

CSI episode pages

Just wanted to make sure you saw I said this:

Fair enough. I was really feeling after I made the nomination like I should have posted something first, hence why I posted on Wikiproject. Give me a few minutes and I'll withdraw the nomination.

-- Redfarmer (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Reverted edit on LOTR page

Hi Yamanbaiia, I appreciate your desire to prevent censorship when you reverted my change to the LOTR page. I didn't mean it in the spirit of censorship and I meant in good faith to improve the encyclopedic style of the article in accordance with the profanity policy. I have put a discussion of this onTalk:Lord of the Rings. I'd be grateful if you could take a look and then let me know what you think. best regards, Sanddune777 (talk) 23:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles January Newsletter

Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Wicked

Please see Talk:Wicked_(musical)#Chicago_Template.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka 3

Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate, that landed on WP:100! I paid close attention to everything that was said, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holiday season and all the off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, and have a great new year, --Elonka 07:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Connie Talbot image

Hi there- as you may remember from the Good Article review, we have both contacted Talbot's official site in an attempt to find images. You seem to be more experienced in this than me- I have never really requested images before. I got the following email back from Claire Freeman, which implies she has already uploaded the image, though I do not know where and whether it was done properly, and so I was wondering if you could shed any light on it-

I was sent instructions by [name removed] and told that to get the photos into the public domain i was to pick one of the four licences from the link she sent me see below: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Choosing_a_license#Common_free_licenses ]. Which I did! If it needs to be the GNU free license then fine - she didn't specify which one - just asked me to choose one. If it needs to be the GNU free documentationlicense thats absolutely fine. Can you amend rather than have me go through the lengthy process of submitting the photos again?

If the image has been uploaded and procedure has been followed then that's fantastic- could you link me to the image or just stick it in the article yourself? Does this email mean more to you than it does to me? J Milburn (talk) 18:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I suppose I could upload, but all I was thinking was that she implies she has already uploaded the image. If you don't know anything about that, then I will just upload it and be done with it. J Milburn (talk) 19:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Yeah- if you could ask an OTRS person on IRC, that would be great. I'm currently indefinately off IRC, annoyingly. J Milburn (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
That's fantastic, thanks very much. Presumably the OTRS volunteer will add a message to the article's talk page when the image is up? J Milburn (talk) 20:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I see you have added a link to the commons. Thanks very much for dealing with this, I owe you a favour! J Milburn (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to bug you again so quickly, but you have been loosely involved in the article, so I wondered if you could check the comments on the talk page about the external link to the German language fansite and offer a third opinion on the matter. J Milburn (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Rudget!

Dear Yamanbaiia, my sincere thanks for your support in my second request for adminship, which ended with 113 supports, 11 opposes, and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank my admin coach and nominator, Rlevse and Ryan Postlethwaite who in addition to Ioeth all inspired me to run for a second candidacy. I would also like to make a special mention to Phoenix-wiki, Dihyrdogen Monoxide and OhanaUnited who all offered to do co-nominations, but I unfortunately had to decline. I had all these funny ideas that it would fail again, and I was prepared for the worst, but at least it showed that the community really does have something other places don't. Who would have though Gmail would have been so effective? 32 emails in one week! (Even if it does classify some as junk :P) I'm glad that I've been appointed after a nail biting and some might call, decision changing RFA, but if you ever need anything, just get in touch. The very best of luck for 2008 and beyond, Rudget. 15:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Television infoboxes

Per consensus reached last year [1] as television is fiction and fiction is in present tense, all actors are to be listed unless the list is excessive. The CSI list is not and, by previous decision, Jorja Fox remains on the list. Thank you. IrishLass (talk) 19:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I replied on my page. I find it bothersome to have a discussion on two different pages. IrishLass (talk) 19:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I've removed my comments from the CSI talk page. I find it truly bothersome that someone would do such a thing without warning, or even a simple courtesy of "could we move this here." IrishLass (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Discussion about your edits

There's a thread on my talk page regarding your edits to a CSI article. Best regards, Rudget. 21:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I think it probably gave the wrong impression, but since you've apologised hopefully it should be over now. Regards, Rudget. 21:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [2]. --Maniwar (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello

As there are no animosities toward you, I'll smile and let you know, the discussion on DJS24's page has nothing to do with CSI, it's about Las Vegas (TV series). IrishLass (talk) 13:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: CSI Infobox

Do you know what the vandalism the user was being accused of on the Las Vegas page was? Redfarmer (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

The animosity they just sprung on me regarding my comment on the talk page indicates they probably don't want to listen. I don't know what kind of false accusations they think my post about agreeing that current cast should only be in an infobox was supposed to express. LOL. If they insist they want Fox in the infobox, we might as them why they're fighting so hard for Fox and not for Louise Lombard. Redfarmer (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I was never fighting for Fox, just another false accusation I can add to the list. IrishLass (talk) 14:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I didn't know you all were on IRC. What server and channel? Redfarmer (talk) 14:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Las Vegas Infobox Dispute

There has been a disscussion opened on the Las Vegas TV Series site on infoboxes. I would like for you to leave some comments. Thank You DJS24 --DJS24 (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan Pryce

Good job with the ref cleanup so far. It's looking better. I know it's a pain, but it's one of the most common criticisms brought up at FAC, so I wanted to prod you into circumventing it ;). BuddingJournalist 02:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

CSI:NY Characters

Thanks for your feedback on the character discussion. I've been playing around in my own sandbox before putting up anything live and wanted your feedback if you had a moment. It's my idea that this will be a page at CSI:NY Characters and the current Minor characters in CSI:_NY could redirect there. I'm curious on a number of issues, mainly if you had any info on Hammerback's character and also how many appearances a character should have to warrant a mention outside List of CSI: NY characters. Any input you have is greatly appreciated. Thanks! Travellingcari (talk) 23:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Point definitely taken re: the page naming. I don't follow much of the TV discussion because it has a tendency to degenerate into cruft. I may end up leaving the pages as are just replace some of the unsourceable text. Need to do some more thinking on this, especially the blatant copyright violations and, as my boss calls it, Department of Redundancy Department. You're right that Mac is a lead, however the issues surrounding information are such that it's a lot of the same information repeated and more actor-focused. I just did a re-write on Gary Sinise earlier this month and am really trying to keep the character/actor separate, if that makes sense. I see so much potential that I want do everything at once, but I'm sure you know how that is ;) Travellingcari (talk) 00:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, on behalf of Walt

Thanks for reverting vandalism on Walt Whitman's page. I was actually in the middle of a legitimate edit while it happened and obliviously editing away while someone kept adding "faggot" this and "faggotry" that. That's why it's such a pain to work on poor Walt's article! --Midnightdreary (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Ha ha! Thanks for the warning! :) -Midnightdreary (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

My User Page

Do you mean I can'y use pictures that already exist on the wiki? I took the V picture from the movie article and 4chan logo from the 4chan article; I didn't upload them.--Piepie (talk) 00:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

  • KK. Thanks for the PROTIP. I'll fix after I'm done trying to fix my bungled ref on the Project Chanology paeg.

--Piepie (talk) 00:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD discussion for Michael Keppler

Just wanted to give you a heads up I nominated Michael Keppler for deletion here. I thought you may want to comment as the only person who has made any comments thus far is insisting the page should be merged and redirected to CSI:_Crime_Scene_Investigation#Past main characters. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 00:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Ipod to Itunes

Hi there. In case you weren't going to check back at the Computing reference desk now that you've gotten an answer and the question is getting closer to archival, I'd just like to point out that there's a program called Senuti that does what you want, and is much easier to use than copying the files from the Ipod directly (it even gives the files names based on their ID3 tags, instead of that automatic Ipod naming format). Confusing Manifestation(Say hi!) 02:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Ben

I was sandboxing a version in my userspace. I was going to get some interviews and the such to add on. Will (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Those section breaks are just for a break in reading, as I don't particularly like nine paragraphs of verbiage at once. We can't do pre/post crash like with the survivors, and the discharge seems like a good place to do an equivalent break. Will (talk) 20:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback?

Hey Yamanbaiia, seems to me that you oughta have rollback. I know you use a few scripts for your reverting needs, but rollback is better. :) Interested? faithless (speak) 10:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah sure, but only if rollback doesn't take Twinkle or Popups away. Thanks for suggesting it.--Yamanbaiia(free hugs!) 12:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
You should be good to go. :) faithless (speak) 12:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks again!--Yamanbaiia(free hugs!) 13:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
You're very welcome. Use it wisely. ;) faithless (speak) 13:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 06:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC)