User talk:Tiggerjay
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "User_talk:Tiggerjay".

Tiggerjay is Online

User	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	Email

Archives

/Archive Older Stuff /Archive April 2008 /Archive May 2008 /Archive June 2008 /Archive Thanks Note: archives may be refactored.

If you are here to register a complaint regarding my edits, before doing so please note: This editor believes in Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle Check and make sure that your edit has a valid, reliable source Understand that I do not want to see valid articles, content or images deleted I disclose that I sometimes make mistakes, and you are at liberty to revert my edits.

Thank you!

Thank you for the barnstar! =) It's an honor to receive one. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

rfa thanks

Sweet userpage dude. mind if I lift some of the stuff? also, thanks for participating in my recent RFA. i've left you some templated thank spam below. while it may not be as tasty as the pizza you're displaying on your main page, I think you'll find it contains many essential vitamins and nutrients. also, feel free to comment on my in-depth RFA analysis. cheers, xenocidic (talk) 00:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

templated rfa thank-spam

Thank you for your support

So...how do I use these things? ;>

I would like to thank the community for placing their trust in me during my recent request for adminship, which passed 72 13 2 . Rest assured, I have read each comment thoroughly and will be addressing the various concerns raised as I step cautiously into my new role as janitor. In particular, I would like to thank Balloonman for putting so much time into reviewing my contributions and writing such a thoughtful nomination statement after knowing me for only a brief period of time (and for convincing me that I was ready to take up the mop now, rather than go through admin coaching).

To my fellow admins - please let me know right away if I ever take any mis-steps with my new tools. Should I make a mistake, and you reverse the action, I will not consider it to be wheel-warring (but please tell me so I can understand what I did wrong).

To everyone - please feel free to slap me around a bit if I ever lose sight of the core philosophy of Wikipedia as I understand it - the advancement of knowledge through the processes of mutual understanding and respect. As always, feel free to drop by my talk page if I can be of any assistance. =)

Sincerely,

~xenocidic, 01:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

UBF, thanks

Thank you for taking a look at the University Bible Fellowship article. Can this article be locked from all conflict-of-interest editors (I'm willing to include myself)? It would be helpful if a third party editor could finalize and lock the content. Bkarcher (talk) 17:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

• There is no real reason for WP:RPP or WP:BLOCK yet... So I'll do some cleanup edit and if they stick then we're good to go - otherwise if the warring continues around my edits, then we may need to escellate. :) Tiggerjay (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you again. I took a look at your edits and they seem fair to me. I agree also with your comment about working on adding verifiable sources. I'm new to Wikipedia and would rather have started with a simpler article to learn the WP edit methods. Bkarcher (talk) 18:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Do you have suggestions for handling the controversy section? I made a proposal on the talk page. Bkarcher (talk) 01:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Orson Welles

That does concern me. The user is removing a lot of information and inserting unsourced material. Probably the best thing to do might be to restore the material they deleted and add in any information that is new from this user and tag it with {{fact}} tags. That way, someone who's more of an expert than me on Welles will get a chance to judge if this user's contributions are valid. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I was looking at the last edit and determined (after a cursory look) that it was a removal of the awards section. I used TW to do an auto revert but then it rolled back 42 edits rather than just one. After closer investigation I noticed that you were already following up on this so I reverted everything back to the latest of the 42 edits. I don't have the time to determine what's good and what isn't. Good luck. Atrian (talk) 21:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Skater girl

Darn, they've discovered the secret I'd tried so hard to keep! But I see I'm not alone. :D Thanks for spotting this and reverting it! In answer, who knows; Peter Pan didn't so if they're going by that precedent, we'll be waiting a long while... ;) Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Presidents

Please read this story about Dwight Eisenhower http://www.whitehouse.gov/kids/presidents/dwightdeisenhower.html Please read this story about Richard Nixon http://www.whitehouse.gov/kids/presidents/richardnixon.html Thier State Represented are from New York —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.169.140.123 (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Please read this story about Dwight Eisenhower

Please read this story about Dwight Eisenhower http://www.whitehouse.gov/kids/presidents/dwightdeisenhower.html Please read this story about Richard Nixon http://www.whitehouse.gov/kids/presidents/richardnixon.html Thier State Represented are from New York —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.169.140.123 (talk) 08:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/AngelOfSadness

You support this RFA twice. Please strike one. Gary King (talk) 16:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Corrected, thanksTiggerjay (talk) 21:48, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

My Rfa

Thanks, Tiggerjay, for participating in my recent RfA, which recently passed with 81 support and 1 neutral !votes. I appreciate all the support and constructive criticism offered in my RfA and I thank you for taking the time to !vote in my nomination. I feel so honoured to be trusted by so many of you and please, if you have any advice, comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page. I would also like to thank Acalamari, Rlevse and Nishkid64, for their nomination statements. Thank you again. AngelOfSadness talk 23:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I look forward to continuing to fight the good fight. Cheers! TN‑X-Man 03:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: My Help Desk Request

I would say thanks for notifying me about this, but one small problem: I cannot recall ever making an inquiry at the help desk. So I'm quite baffled at the moment eh? -- Reaper X 03:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah right. Thanks for clarifying. Cheers. -- Reaper X 19:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Guess who

Guess who's been making kooky edits again, this time to Disneyland Paris. --blm07 01:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Xplor International

First let me thank you for you help in cleaning up the Xplor International article. Its great that folks like you take the time to help, rather than just tagging and leaving it for us newbies to figure out what we did wrong.

I have added a citation that provides an example of Xplor's mission and focus. Does this meet the 'needs citation' requirement? It's quite difficult to find a 3rd party article that introduces a 27 year old organization well known to most people in the field of technology.

I also put back the reference to the Electronic Document Professional program as this represents one of Xplor's longest and most visible contributions to the industry. (We have created a stub that goes into more detail on the program). Should I created a seperate H2 called "Activites" and list it there?

Again, thanks for your help.

William Broddy edp (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I would like to put the regional websites in the 'external links' section. These are seperate web-sites maintained by voluteers in the different regions (and contain information unique to that region)

• US Northeast Region
• US Midatlantic Region
• Canadian Region
• UK Region

Is this okay?

William Broddy edp (talk) 14:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU, Status, and you!

As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible) system - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 22:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Cashmere

I was wondering why it was that you reverted to that particular version of the Cashmere article. The MOS on order of entries for dab pages doesn't place a link to the Kashmir article at the top, for one thing, as it is not the same spelling. Also, I see no need to get rid of the categories. If it is the wording that bothered you, could you please suggest an alternate wording on the talk page? Thanks, Loggie (talk) 15:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 90 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral. All the best, Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 20:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

UBF COI/NPOV

• Tiggerjay: Would you take a look at the current state of the University Bible Fellowship article and see if you have any further comments or edits? I added a "Reviews and reactions" section that hopefully meets Wiki NPOV guidelines. What else should be done to resolve the COI dispute? Thank you! Bkarcher (talk) 19:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)