User talk:Elonka
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "User_talk:Elonka".

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32 About archives

Coolcaeser

Coolceaser is back again with repeated rude, insulting remarks at Talk:Law of the United States. Was invited to discussion and identification of a shorter list of readings but declined to participate in any constructive manner. Has been warned about incivility both on that talk page and on his own talk page, but continues to display a pattern of rude behavior without making any conciliatory gestures or participating in cordial discussion or negotiation. What can be done? Mervyn Emrys (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Mervyn, it would be more useful if you learnt to assume good faith in what appears to be a reasoned response to your continued refusal to follow the good advice that's been given to you, and stopped jumping to take offence at attempts by others to lay out the problem with your proposals. Such sensitivity to perceived slights merely causes conflict. . dave souza, talk 20:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Not sure what this editor's problem is. Seems mostly to defend rudeness of other editors. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 02:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear Elonka,

Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.

Kind regards,

Majorly talk 21:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Bonne Année, Bonne Santé!

Happy New Year Elonka! Let me wish you the very best for the year 2009! Cheers PHG (talk) 16:48, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

CM archives

Hi. I was just cleaning up my watchlist, and after much staring, I cannot determine why User talk:Charles Matthews isn't being properly archived by MiszaBot. Possibly you can? Happy new year too ;) -- Quiddity (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree, it's very curious. I did some staring too but didn't see anything obvious, so have left a note for Misza to take a look at it. --Elonka 15:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

All fixed now, see User talk:Misza13#Archive debugging for the details. Thanks for spotting the problem! :) --Elonka 15:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

List of pseudosciences

Hi Elonka, I got and took to heart your note; I struck some unhelpful material that you referred to. Also responded in detail on my talk page. I must admit I was a little annoyed at your comment, as I felt that you were going after the wrong guy... here's one dude committing all these fouls, and I get chastised for kvetching about it! ;-) That said, I noticed your exchange on Dematt's talk page; anyone who has the respect of Fyslee and Dematt has mine too, so I'm sure we'll get along fine. Happy New Year! --Backin72 (n.b.) 07:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

High-level radioactive waste

Welcome back, and thanks. Never thought I'd see the day. All the Talk sections there except "Moved" were actually part of the GA review and probably should be archived along with the GA talk. Don't know why they were not.

Also note the RfC at Talk: Law of the United States can probably be closed. Nothing happening there since mid December. Oops, somebody else got it.

Finally, someone has been busily "sanitizing" the Sierra Club article to remove factual information and references under "Immigration controversy" section they apparently think reflect poorly on the organization (POV). I've reverted a couple things, one more than once. Might want to watch that until it stops.

Hope your cruise was great fun. Tanned? Or just rested? Cheers! Mervyn Emrys (talk) 17:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your help in archiving the Disney stuff and College and Happy New Year! --Funandtrvl (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)