Talk:Rielle Hunter RfC: Is Rielle Hunter's Father's Background Relevant in Bio?
Talk:Sri Chinmoy The inclusion of a controversy section is in dispute. Uninvolved editors are invited to please comment.
Talk:Zakir Naik There is ongoing dispute over Zakir Naik BLP. Comments from uninvolved users are requested.
Talk:Natalee Holloway In order to avoid claiming this missing person is alive or dead, editors object to the use of "is" or "was" in the lead, or alternatives, despite the purpose of an encyclopedia article to define the topic and give context, and despite guidelines including Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Provide context for the reader.
Talk:Bob Herbert This section violates numerous policies dealing with WP:NPOV and WP:BLP as described in the above talk page discussion and cites no secondary sources to prove its significance
Talk:Melissa Farley Are there any remaining NPOV or BLP issues with this article?
Talk:Tucker Max Disagreement on whether to include a criticism section, based primarily on sourcing concerns. Are Opie and Anthony a reliable source? Is Craig Davidson a reliable source?
Talk:Giovanni di Stefano Is the expulsion from New Zealand enough notable, relevant, NPOV, BLP-compliant, and appropiate for this biography?
To add a discussion to RFC:
Add {{RFCbio| section=section name !! reason=a short summary of the discussion !! time= ~~~~~ }}
Mind the exclamation marks! Do not use pipe symbols to separate the parameters.
Warning:! and = will not work anywhere in the template, except for parameter separation. {{ and }}might work outside of the time parameter. | works again.
Do not edit the RFC list directly; the bot will invariably undo your edits.