| content | |||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology .
This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments | |
 |
This article falls within the scope of the ancient Near East WikiProject. Please participate by editing this article, and help us improve articles to good article standards, or visit the project page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
Mesopotamian mythology is part of the WikiProject Iraq, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
The original Talk page for this article has been destroyed and the history page truncated..
"Mesopotamian mythology" is the correct title and the convention (see Encyclopaedia Britannica and others.) Sargonious represents himself as an Assyrian nationalist and moved this page (January 13) alone without discussion, explanation. Now I would support a movement for independence of Assyrians and Kurds in Iraq (isn't Iraq naturally three or four countries?), but Encyclopedias are not soap boxes for political pet projects.
How does anyone type in "Assyro-BabyloMGA HOTDOG BA NINYO NAKAIN NINYO NA MGA CHEESEDOG HARHAR NGENGENGE BLURFFFF....nian mythology" anyway? or perhaps we are to adopt Sumero-Akkado-Assyro-Babylonian mythology to be most precise? Iranian nationalists will of course want to receive recognition for the influence of ancient Persia in the religion of the region, so perhaps Zoroastro-Sumero-Akkado-Assyro-Babylonian mythology would cover all bases. Did I leave anyone out?
Drastic moves like this should be discussed with others and the associated Talk pages should never be destroyed.
Castanea dentata 20:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, definitely move it. "Assyro-Babylonian" is a dumb name. If it's general, it should be "Mesopotamian", and if it's specific, it should be either "Assyrian" or "Babylonian". In fact, we already do have a page on Babylonian mythology. —Keenan Pepper 02:50, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
Drastic Editing Needed
Who is responsible for "This accounts for the origin of most of the world as we know it according to the a summary of most of the myths." This is eronious, a POV and needs removal.
John D. Croft 16:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Suggestions
- You need to decide whether the Sumerian or the Akkadian (Assyrian-Babylonian) names of the deities should be used in the text. At present, names of Sumerian and Akkadian deities are mixed together; Utu/Shamash, Inanna/Ishtar and Nanna/Sin.
- While there are firm archaeological support for a good description of Sumerian gods and their temples, you should be cautious when dealing with Sumerian mythology. With few exceptions, all religious literature -the myths- known to us were written down in the Old Babylonian period, and later (Enuma elish, Athrahasis, the Gilgamesh epic).
--JFK 19:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- note, there are full descriptions of many Inanna texts from the URIII period, though whether those reflect traditional sumerian religion or show influence of the just ended Akkadian religion cna't be determined. Some people think sumerian was nothing but a literary language by that point! And dont' forget, fragments of Bilgames (gilgamesh's earlier sumerian incarnation) exist in sumerian.
I also would say its wise not to chose "one name" for the gods, as the gods are not equivalent. Their roles and importance changes. Mesopotamian scholars would not mistake Inanna for Ishtar, as their characters and relative importance are different enough that they refer to the one they mean, not only by historical period, but invoking the personality of that deity. Shamash/Utu is another great example! Dumuzi/Tammuz... picking one name won't solve anything, it will obliterate the difference between them.
This article needs an overhaul, and to be kept separate. Sumerian in one article, Semitic in another. with an overview perhaps in this article and "see main article Sumerian Mythology" or whatever linked in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.182.179 (talk) 07:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- should add an "in popular culture" section..... mostly to link to Neal Stephenson's novel Snow Crash —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.243.100.52 (talk) 06:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Template of Ancient Mesopotamia
I inserted this article Mesopotamian mythology into the Template:Ancient Mesopotamia, and replaced it with the odd choice Nibiru (see Template talk:Ancient Mesopotamia. I think this article makes a good starting point in the mythology section of the template with a lot of valuable entries. --JFK 16:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
I would like to know if whoever it was that wrote the deity section actually speaks English, and is so if they could please at least make the punctuation semi-coherent. Or at least proof-read the thing before posting it.
Suggestion in dealing with various cultures, etc.
While I support having a general Mesopotamian mythology page, it seems that such a page should be truncated into sections dealing with Sumerians and Babylonians, at least. They're two different time periods and have different takes on the myths that are shared at all. Perhaps the Mesopotamian mythology page could be a general overview, while detailed accounts of the myths could be provided in Sumerian mythology and Babylonian mythology respectively. --Krishva 06:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- They should be demerged as happened on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sumerian_mythology&oldid=8136846, the fact that Marduk is the head honcho to the Babylonians and Enlil was to the Sumerians is also another point. Most likely if you asked a Sumerian who Marduk was they would answer, What are you on drugs or something!!!. Enlil Ninlil 21:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Different view
I stated this on the babylonian mythology page. But this page really does a poor job of dealing with "mesopotamian myhtology". It treats it as a single unified mass. But 3rd millenium mythology, 2nd millenium mythology, nand 1st millenium mythology are different balls of wax. Sumerian and Semitic deities are presented beside one another, and, in some cases (erroneously sometimes) simply declared equivalent. Ishtar might have her roots in the cult of Inanna, but she's hardly an identical character. The prominence of inanna for sumerians is not similar to the prominence of ishtar for babylonians/assyrians. Similarly, greeks thought of Ares entirely negatively, but the romans thought of mars often quite positively. You would not equate Mars with Ares; they simply aren't the same person, despite serving SIMILAR functions in the pantheons.
I think this article needs expanding, from assyriologists/sumerologists, or division into 'sumerian" and "semitic" mesopotamian mythologies, including some kind of chronology. Marduk/Ashur are head honchos in the 2nd millenium onward, but only to those cities (Babylon, Ashur/nineveh/calach) where the cults were located. And during times when those cities were at the heads of great empires. What about, as someone points out, the Enlil dominance during much of sumerian dominance of the south? Dumuzi and Tammuz, Enki and Ea, these gods lose in importance greatly in the transition to semitic deities. (H)Adad is not the same as Ninurta/Ningirsu....
what about the pre-anthropomorphic sumerian deitis? Imdugud for instance? Anzuu?
This mish-mashery obliterates any change of transformation. it would be like presenting christianity, and judaism, as one religion, with a couple different terms, and no sense of the historical development, one from the other, then both inside themselves... :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.182.179 (talk) 06:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
And lets not forget the OTHER mesopotamian cultures that exist in the periphery. Urartu, Hannigalbat! ELAM! ooi oi oi ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.182.179 (talk) 07:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Er...
For example, the Biblical account of the creation of man as well as Noah's flood resemble the Sumerian tales very closely, though the Sumerian myths were written many centuries earlier than the Tanakh (Old Testament).
Citation needed? (ApostleJoe (talk) 20:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC))
- I think so. It would be easier to say that Noah's flood resembles similar Mesopotamian myths thought to [citation needed] originate in the Sumerian myth of Zi-ud-sura/Utnapishtim. But still citations would be good. Said: Rursus ☻ 18:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
I move that a seperate article be created for Sumerian Mythology, as proposed b y 70.52.182.179. Later, we can get an Akkadian and Assyrian one going too. NJMauthor (talk) 23:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- That would be good. Would you please go vote against merging Babylonian mythology with Mesopotamian mythology, HERE if you wish? Separating the mythologies would be preferable because of the long time span, I think. Said: Rursus ☻ 18:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
