| content | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This is not a forum for general discussion of Capital punishment. Any such messages will be deleted. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. |
 |
Discussions on this page may escalate into heated debate. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here. See also: Wikipedia:Etiquette. |
 |
This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. | ||||||||||
 |
This article has been selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia. | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| A summary of this article appears in death. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Correction and Detention Facilities articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
 |
Capital punishment is within the scope of the Law Enforcement WikiProject. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||||
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. | ||
| B | Quality: B-Class | ||
| Mid | Importance: Mid | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
POV problems
ohhh heyyyyy!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.78.174.2 (talk) 14:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC) In reading and reviewing this article, it would appear that there are some galring POV problems. One that jumps out is the heading "Movements towards 'humane' execution." The use of quotes around 'humane' definately give away the author's point of view on the topic. This specific problem is rather widespread, particularly in that section. Also, the sidebar "Homicide" box might be going a little overboard. Without specific elaboration, it gives the distinct impression that all forms of homicide are capital offenses, when, as point of fact, they are not. Case in point, self-defense (e.g., justifiable homicide) is not a capital offense, despite being techincally homicide. All that, and the fact that more attention is given to the controvery (with distinct POV problems) surrounding capital punishment than to capital punishment itself gives this article some glaring problems. Smit8678 (talk) 04:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- 1. Advocates of the death penalty talk about humane and inhumane forms, so I don't see how that is a problem. Are you saying that there is a point of view which sees all forms of execution as equally humane? (even stoning?) 2. Capital punishment is a form of justifiable homicide. 3. I don't think your assertion of giving more attention to the controversy than capital punishment itself holds up in light of the actual numbers of characters in this article. Most of the discussion of the controversy has been pushed out into the other articles in the sidebar. SBPrakash (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Why is this link considered spam ?
MisterFine (talk) 05:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC) I tried to insert a link to Opposing Views' debate between Amnesty International and a leading national D.A. on the death penalty, which contains great arguments and detailed information. The content doesn't belong here, but it is certainly deeper and relevant. When I did it, someone struck it as spam... but it appears to meet all the guidelines. Why doesn't it meet the guidelines, and if it does how do I get it put in ?
What is the word 'gay' doing there?
'In most places that practice GAY capital punishment today, the death penalty is reserved as punishment for premeditated murder, espionage, treason, or as part of military justice.' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.216.202.168 (talk) 21:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- Obviously vandalized. That-Vela-Fella (talk) 20:03, 29 February 2008
What picture? There are a few & all look fine.Ok, I see now what you mean when one hides the content. I'll move the map down then. That-Vela-Fella (talk) 21:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Another song
Craigg1 (talk) 11:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC) There is a song by Steve Earl called Billy Austin that was used in the soundtrack of Dead Man Walking which is about a man on death row. I think it deserves to be included as a great example of "death row" music.
Another song by the swedish band Candlemass - "At the gallow's end" is about a man who is waiting for his execution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.134.235.18 (talk) 21:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Debate summary
Has anyone made the argument that a slow death of natural causes after decades of confinement is a worse punishment than a quick and painless death?
Also what is the deal with these Wikiproject boxes here on the talk page, to the right? Could someone please put them back up top in a multiple-Wikiprojects-box so they don't bunch the [edit] links? SBPrakash (talk) 12:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 58.106.129.98 (talk)
I am not sure where or how to make the entry, but recently the History Channel has documented that Iran executed a 16 year old girl for the crime of seducing a 50 year cab driver. They claimed she seduced him for the first time when she was only 13 years old.
It seems to me that this 50 year old cab driver raped this 13 year old little girl and did so repeatedly over a number of years and according to Islamic Law, when a girl gets raped its always the girl's fault, even when she only 13. Pastorart1974 (talk) 00:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- This article isn't really the place to examine individual cases. David Underdown (talk) 08:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
proposed citation
I propose the following citations for sentence in the summary where it is stated that capital punishment has a higher financial cost than incarcerating an inmate for life. The following applies to the United States only and most of the studies following are done within a single state, are therefore not applicable throughout the country, but do provide proper citation to the theory that capital punishment is more costly.
Gold, Russell. The Wall Street Journal: Counties Struggle With High Cost Of Prosecuting Death-Penalty Cases. The Wall Street Journal, January 9, 2002.
Tempest, Rone. Death Row Often Means a Long Life; California condemns many murderers, but few are ever executed. Los Angeles Times, March 6, 2005.
Kansas Audit of Department of Corrections. Legislative Post Audit Committee. Legislative Post Audit Committee, December 19, 2003.
Vermont Legislative Research Shop. Deterrent Value and Cost of Death Penalty. The University of Vermont, April 23, 2001.
Judicial Conference Committee on Defender Services. Subcomittee Report. Subcommittee on Federal Death Penalty Cases, 1997.
Phillip J. Cook & Donna B. Slawson. The Cost of Processing Murder Cases in North Carolina, 1993. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jssfub (talk • contribs) 01:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikiproject
I would propose creation of a Wikiproject on capital punishment. I do not think that it is too arcane of a subject, and many large articles could fit under the scope, including those dealing with lethal injection and human rights in China, among many others. CopaceticThought (talk) 23:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Where's the article on public executions?
You know, like in the olden days such as revolutionary France where little old ladies would do their knitting in front of the Madame Guillotine, etc.?
Why does "Public Execution" redirect to here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.211.78.60 (talk) 05:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
I think you should add "The Stranger" to the Lit section. Here is a quote from Wikipedia:(The novel tells the story of a man, Meursault... who eventually kills a man. The story continues as Meursault waits to be executed.) Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.111.78 (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Relevance to Christianity?
Noticing Wikiproject boxes, why is this article relevant to Christianity, especially over any other religion? It seems either biased, or improperly placed. Can someone please explain why these two are connected? Thanks! Neuro√Synapse ▪ ∆ 08:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- I moved the template box to the bottom under the others, but really any project can add any article to their domain. Take it up on their talk pages if you must. --70.142.44.220 (talk) 18:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Cause of death
The text, 'Thieves would be imprisoned in suspended cages and left to die by dehydration', located at the beginning of the History section and attached to the first image as a caption, seems to imply that locking someone in a cage causes them to die by dehydration. If the prisoner were to die by some other means, their incarceration has still served its purpose. Can we simply omit 'by dehydration'? - Mhitchens (talk) 21:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Incorrect Map
The world map on this page is incorrect and I propose that it be deleted unless an alternate can be found. Specifically, the map of the US on the world map is incorrect when compared to the United States map on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_United_States
If the "Retains, though not used for at least 10 years" classification is used on other countries and US States are pictured with differences in capital punishment law, then the "Retains, though not used for at least 10 years" must also be used within the US to accurately show American attitudes toward capital punishment.Rander26 (talk) 21:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- "Retains, though not used for at least 10 years" would describe Colorado, Nebraska, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, Kansas and New Hampshire if my count is correct. Rmhermen (talk) 06:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
-
- As stated on the map, the federal death penalty remains applicable in all states, so the US is considered retentionist overall - perhaps it would be better ot remove the state boundaries from the map. David Underdown (talk) 10:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Please remove references in the article to 'more developed nations/countries'
For example: 'South Africa, which is probably the most developed African nation'.
These are opinions and are not facts.
Particularly offensive is the sentence: 'Singapore, Japan and the U.S. are the only fully developed countries that have retained the death penalty.'
Which gives the view that other nations that are retentionist are not somehow 'developed'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.148.96 (talk) 03:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
STFU you politically correct n00b SOB. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.251.14 (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of image
An image was deleted on the following ground: "it does not illustrate the capital punishment". But it clearly does as it shows people "waiting to be shot" as follows from title of the painting.Biophys (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
