Conformational modulation of serpin activityThe conformational mobility of serpins provides a key advantage over static lock and key protease inhibitors. In particular, the function of inhibitory serpins can be readily controlled by specific cofactors. The X-ray crystal structures of antithrombin, heparin cofactor II, MENT and murine antichymotrypsin reveal that these serpins adopt a conformation where the first two amino acids of the RCL are inserted into the top of the A β-sheet (see figures 4 and 7). The partially inserted conformation is important because co-factors are able to conformationally switch partially inserted serpins into a fully expelled form.4142 This conformational rearrangement makes the serpin a more effective inhibitor. The archetypal example of this situation is antithrombin, which circulates in plasma in a partially inserted relatively inactive state. The primary specificity determining residue (the P1 Arginine) points towards the body of the serpin and is unavailable to the protease (Figure 7). Upon binding a high affinity heparin pentasaccharide sequence within long chain heparin, antithrombin undergoes a conformational change, RCL expulsion and exposure of the P1 Arginine. The heparin pentasaccharide bound form of antithrombin is thus a more effective inhibitor of thrombin and factor Xa (figure 7).4344 Furthermore, both of these coagulation proteases contain binding sites (called exosites) for heparin. Heparin therefore also acts as a template for binding of both protease and serpin, further dramatically accelerating the interaction between the two parties (Figure 7). After the initial interaction, the final serpin complex is formed and the heparin moiety is released. This interaction is physiologically important. For example, after injury to the blood vessel wall heparin is exposed, and antithrombin is thus activated to control the clotting response. The understanding of the molecular basis of this interaction formed the basis of the development of Fondaparinux, a synthetic form of Heparin pentasaccharide used as an anti-clotting drug.45
Figure 7:
From left to right. 1. The partially inserted conformation of native antithrombin. The P1 Arginine is in purple spheres (from pdb 2ANT). 2. Binding of the high affinity heparin pentasaccharide sequence (in cyan spheres) within long chain heparin (in yellow spheres) (from pdb 1TB6). Note how the P1 Arginine residue has flipped to a more exposed position. 3. Initial interaction of thrombin (orange) with the RCL. Thrombin also contains a binding site for heparin (from pdb 1TB6). 4. Following docking, the final serpin enzyme complex is formed (illustrated using the antitrypsin / trypsin complex) and heparin is released (from pdb 1EZX). Certain serpins spontaneously undergo the S to R transition as part of their function, to form a conformation termed the latent state (Figure 8). In latent serpins the first strand of the C-sheet has to peel off to allow full RCL insertion. Latent serpins are unable to interact with proteases and are not protease inhibitors. The transition to latency represents a control mechanism for the serpin PAI-1. PAI-1 is released in the inhibitory conformation, however, undergoes conformational change to the latent state unless it is bound to the cofactor vitronectin.46 Thus PAI-1 contains an "auto-inactivation" mechanism. Similarly, antithrombin can also spontaneously convert to the latent state as part of its normal function. Finally, the N-terminus of tengpin (see pdbs 2PEE and 2PEF), a serpin from Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis, is required to lock the molecule in the native inhibitory state. Disruption of interactions made by the N-terminal region results in spontaneous conformational change of this serpin to the latent conformation.4748
Figure 8a: X-ray crystal structure of native PAI-1 (from pdb 1DVM) (stabilised though mutation). The RCL is in magenta, and the first β-strand of the C-β-sheet in yellow. In the absence of vitronectin, PAI-1 converts to the latent form (right) (from pdb 1LJ5). The first strand of the C-sheet has peeled off to allow full RCL insertion.
Figure 8b: Structure of native PAI-1 bound to vitronectin (in cyan) (from pdb 1OCO). Part of the RCL is disordered in this structure and is represented by a dashed line. Serpin receptor interactionsIn humans, extracellular serpin-enzyme complexes are rapidly cleared from circulation. One mechanism by which this occurs is the low density lipoprotein receptor related protein (LRP receptor), which binds to inhibitory complexes made by antithrombin, PA1-1 and neuroserpin, causing uptake and subsequent signalling events.49 Thus, as a consequence of the conformational change during serpin-enzyme complex formation, serpins may act as signalling molecules that alert cells to the presence of protease activity.49 The fate of intracellular serpin-enzyme complexes remains to be characterised. Conformational change and non-inhibitory functionCertain non-inhibitory serpins also use the serpin conformational change as part of their function. For example the native (S) form of thyroxine-binding globulin has high affinity for thyroxine, whereas the cleaved (R) form has low affinity. Similarly, native (S) Cortisol Binding Globulin (CBG) has higher affinity for cortisol than its cleaved (R) counterpart (Figure 3). Thus, in these serpins, RCL cleavage and the S to R transition has been commandeered to allow for ligand release, rather than protease inhibition.502120 Serpins, serpinopathies and human diseaseSerpins are peculiarly vulnerable to inactivating disease causing mutations that result in the formation of misfolded polymers or protein aggregates ("serpinopathies"). Well characterised serpinopathies include alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency (alpha-1), which may cause familial emphysema and sometimes liver cirrhosis, certain familial forms of thrombosis related to antithrombin deficiency, types 1 and 2 hereditary angioedema (HAE) related to deficiency of C1-inhibitor and familial encephalopathy with neuroserpin inclusion bodies (FENIB; a rare type of dementia caused by neuroserpin polymerisation).1110 Serpins thus belong to a large group of molecules such as the prion proteins and the glutamine repeat containing proteins that cause proteopathies or conformational diseases.10 Serpin polymerisation causes disease in two ways. Firstly, the lack of active serpin results in uncontrolled protease activity and tissue destruction, this is seen in the case of antitrypsin deficiency. Secondly, the polymers themselves clog up the endoplasmic reticulum of cells that synthesize serpins, eventually resulting in cell death and tissue damage. In the case of antitrypsin deficiency, antitrypsin polymers cause the death of liver cells, sometimes resulting in liver damage and cirrhosis. The mechanism by which serpin polymers cause cell death remains to be fully understood. Like cleaved serpins, serpin polymers are hyperstable with respect to heating and each serpin monomer appears to have undergone the stressed to relaxed transition. Furthermore, serpin polymers are unable to inhibit target proteases, suggesting that the RCL is unavailable and inserted into the A-sheet. In the absence of definitive structural data, it was therefore postulated that serpins polymerise via a mechanism known as A-sheet polymerisation 11. In normal function the RCL inserts into the A β-sheet to form a fourth strand (figure 4). In the A-sheet polymerisation model, it was suggested that the RCL of one serpin molecule spontaneously inserted into the A-sheet of another, to form a long chain polymer (figure 9). In effect, it was thus proposed that polymerization occurred as a consequence of the requirement of the serpin scaffold to accept an additional β-strand. Serpins were one of the first families for which disease-causing mutations were directly analyzed in reference to the available crystal structures.52 In support of the A-sheet polymerisation model, it was noted that many serpin mutations that cause polymerisation localise to two distinct regions of the molecule (highlighted in figure 4a) termed the shutter and the breach. The shutter and the breach contain highly-conserved residues, underlie the path of RCL insertion and are proposed to be important for conformational change. Two structures of cleaved serpin polymers have been solved; both of which reveal RCL / A-sheet sheet linkages similar to those predicted by the A sheet polymerisation mechanism. 5354 However, in direct contrast to the known properties of physiological serpin polymers, crystals of cleaved serpin A-sheet polymers readily dissociate into monomeric forms. 5354 A large body of data now suggest that the events associated with serpin polymerisation occur during the folding of the molecule, and that mutations that cause serpinopathies interfere with the ability of the serpin to fold to the metastable native state.55 In normal serpin folding, the serpin rapidly moves through a key folding intermediate to attain the native state. Many studies have shown that it is the serpin folding intermediate that has the ability to polymerise, hence it is important that this folding species rapidly moves on to adopt native state. It was shown that mutations such as the Z-antitrypsin variant (Glu 342 to Lys) somehow prevented the final stage of seprin folding and caused the accumulation of the folding intermediate. Accordingly, population of the folding intermediate resulted in polymer formation.55 Interestingly, it was noted that once folded, the Z-antitrypsin variant closely resembles wild-type material in terms of thermal stability and inhibitory activity.55 Together these data have presented an important challenge to the A-sheet model for serpin polymerisation. On the one hand the idea that serpin polymer formation essentially takes advantage of the serpin mechanism of conformational change is an attractive one. On the other, the biophyiscal data in particular suggest that it is a folding intermediate (rather than the native form) that polymerises, and it is clear that this intermediate must have different structural properties to the native, folded state.
Figure 10: Model of a domain swapped serpin polymer.1 Both s5A and the RCL insert into the A-sheet of another serpin monomer.
In 2008, a key serpin crystal structure was determined that strongly suggests that physiological serpin polymers do not form via the A-sheet mechanism and instead form via a more extensive domain swapping event.1 The structure solved is of an antithrombin dimer (figure 1), and reveals that both strands s5A and the RCL are able to be incorporated into the A-sheet of another serpin molecule. This structure can readily be adapted to form long chain polymers (figure 10). 1 The new "domain swapped" model for serpin polymerisation reconciles the available biophysical and biochemical data. In particular, these data suggest that the final stage of serpin folding to the native state is most likely the incorporation of the fifth strand (s5A). Of key importance is the observation that several polymerogenic mutations (including the Z-variant) cluster on and around s5A and mutation of these residues may prevent proper incorporation of s5A into the A-sheet. As a result, during folding the mutation causes the serpin to remain "stuck" in the intermediate form. Much of the intermediate species, unable to efficiently form the native conformation, eventually forms hyperstable polymers via the insertion of both s5A and the RCL into another intermediate (figure 10). Mutations that result in spontaneous formation of latent (or latent-like), inactive conformations
Figure 11: X-ray crystal structure of the δ-conformation of the Leucine 55 to Proline mutation of antichymotrypsin (from pdb 1QMN). Four residues of the RCL (magenta; dashed line indicates disordered region) are inserted into the top of the A β-sheet. Part of the F α-helix (cyan) has unwound and fills the bottom half of the A β-sheet.56
Certain pathogenic mutations in serpins can promote inappropriate transition to the monmoeric latent state (see figure 8a for the structure of the latent state). This causes disease because it reduces the amount of active inhibitory serpin. For example, the disease-linked antithrombin variants wibble and wobble,57 both promote formation of the latent state. It is also worth highlighting a structure of a disease-linked human antichymotrypsin variant that further demonstrates the extraordinary flexibility of the serpin scaffold. The structure of antichymotrypsin (Leucine 55 to Proline) revealed a novel "δ" conformation that may represent an intermediate between the native and latent state (Figure 11). In the delta conformation four residues of the RCL are inserted into the top of β-sheet A. The bottom half of the sheet is filled as a result of one of the α-helices (the F-helix) partially switching to a β-strand conformation, completing the β-sheet hydrogen bonding.56 It is unclear whether other serpins can adopt this conformer, or whether this conformation has a functional role. However, it is speculated that the δ-conformation may be adopted by Thyroxine binding globulin during thyroxine release.21 Other mechanisms of serpin-related diseaseIn humans, simple deficiency of many serpins (e.g. through a null mutation) may result in disease (see Table 1). Rarely, single amino acid changes in the RCL of a serpin alters the specificity of the inhibitor and allow it to target the wrong protease. For example, the Antitrypsin-Pittsburgh mutation (methionine 358 to arginine) allowed the serpin to inhibit thrombin, thus causing a bleeding disorder.58 Serpins are suicide inhibitors, the RCL acting as a "bait". Certain disease-linked mutations in the RCL of human serpins permit true substrate-like behaviour and cleavage without complex formation. Such variants are speculated to affect the rate or the extent of RCL insertion into the A-sheet. These mutations effectively result in serpin deficiency through a failure to properly control the target protease.5259 Several non-inhibitory serpins play key roles in important human diseases. Most notably, maspin functions as a tumour suppressor in breast and prostate cancer. The mechanism of maspin function remains to be fully understood. Murine knockouts of maspin are lethal; these data suggest that maspin plays a key role in development.60 EvolutionSerpins were initially believed to be restricted to eukaryote organisms, but have since been found in a number of bacteria and archaea.4561 It remains unclear whether these prokaryote genes are the descendants of an ancestral prokaryotic serpin or whether they are the product of lateral gene transfer (genetic transfer between organisms not by evolutionary descent). Rawlings et al., showed that serpins are the most widely distributed and largest family of protease inhibitors.7 Types of serpinHuman serpinsIn 2001, a serpin nomenclature was established (see table 1, below).8 The naming system is based upon a phylogenetic analysis of ~500 serpins.4 The human genome encodes 16 serpin clades, termed serpinA through to serpinP, encoding 29 inhibitory and 7 non-inhibitory serpin proteins (see Law et al. (2006) for a recent review).62 The proteins are named serpinXY where X is the clade of the protein and Y the number of the protein within that clade. Table 1 lists each human serpin, together with brief notes in regards to each molecules function and the consequence (where known) of dysfunction or deficiency. Table 1
Insect SerpinsThe Drosophila melanogaster genome contains 29 serpin encoding genes. Amino acid sequence analysis has placed 14 of these serpins in serpin clade Q and 3 in serpin clade K with the remaining 12 serpins classified as orphan serpins not belonging to any clade.124 The clade classification system is difficult to use for Drosophila serpins and instead a nomenclature system has been adopted that is based on the position of Drosphila serpin genes on the Drosophila chromosomes. 13 of the Drosophila serpins occur as isolated genes in the genome (including Serpin-27A, see below), with the remaining 16 organised into three gene clusters that occur at chromosome positions 28D (2 serpins), 42D (5 serpins), 43A (4 serpins), 77B (3 serpins) and 88E (2 serpin).124125126 Drosophila serpin-27AStudies on Drosophila serpins reveal that Serpin-27A inhibits the Easter protease (the final protease in the Nudel, Gastrulation Defective, Snake and Easter proteolytic cascade) and thus controls dorsoventral patterning. Easter functions to cleave Spätzle (a chemokine-type ligand), which results in toll mediated signaling. In addition to its central role in embryonic patterning, toll signalling is also important for the innate immune response in insects. Accordingly, serpin-27A additionally functions to control the insect immune response.127128129 Worm SerpinsThe genome of the nematode worm C. elegans contains nine serpins, however, only five of these molecules appear to function as protease inhibitors.25 One of these serpins, SRP-6, has been shown to perform a protective function and guard against stress induced calpain-associated lysosomal disruption. Further SRP-6 functions to inhibit lysosomal cysteine proteases released after lysosomal rupture. Accordingly, worms lacking SRP-6 are sensitive to stress. Most notably, SRP-6 knockout worms die when placed in water (the hypo-osmotic stress lethal phenotype or Osl). Based on these data it is suggested that lysosomes play a general and controllable role in determining cell fate.130 Plant serpinsThe presence of serpins in plants has long been recognised - indeed, barley Z serpin is the major protein component in beer. The genome sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana is predicted to encode 29 serpins. Plant serpins are able to inhibit serine proteases in vitro. However, the absence of close relatives of chymotrypsin-like proteases in plants suggests that these molecules may instead perform an alternative function. Indeed, Arabidopsis serpin1 inhibits metacaspase-like proteases in vivo and may control cell death pathways.131 Fungal serpinsA single fungal serpin has been characterized to date: celpin from Piromyces sp. strain E2. Piromyces is an anaerobic fungus found in the gut of ruminants and is important for digesting plant material. Celpin is predicted to be an inhibitory molecule and contains two N-terminal dockerin domains in addition to the serpin domain. Dockerins are commonly found in proteins that localise to the fungal cellulosome, a large extracellular mulitprotein complex that breaks down cellulose6. It is therefore suggested that celpin protects the cellulosome against plant proteases. Interestingly certain bacterial serpins also localize to the cellulosome 132. Prokaryote serpinsPredicted serpin genes are sporadicly distributed in prokaryotes. In vitro studies on some of these moelcules have revealed that they are able to inhibit proteases and it is suggested that they function as inhibitors in vivo. Interestingly, several prokaryote serpins are found in extremophiles. Accordingly, and in contrast to mammalian serpins, these molecule possess elevated resistance to heat denaturation.133134 The precise role of most bacterial serpins remains obscure, however, Clostridium thermocellum serpin localises to the cellulosome. It is suggested that the role of cellulosome-associated serpins may be to prevent unwanted protease activity against the cellulosome.132 Viral serpinsSerpins are also expressed by viruses as a way to evade the host's immune defense.135 In particular, serpins expressed by pox viruses, including cow pox (vaccinia) and rabbit pox (myxoma), are of interest because of their potential use as novel therapeutics for immune and inflammatory disorders as well as transplant therapy. 136137 A study on Serp1 reveals this molecule suppresses the Toll-mediated innate immune response and allows indefinite cardiac allograft survival in rats. 138136Studies on Crma and Serp2, reveal both are cross-class inhibitor and targets both serine (Granzyme B; albeit weakly) and cysteine proteases (Caspase 1 and Caspase 8).139140 In comparison to their mammalian counterparts, viral serpins contain significant deletions of elements of secondary structure. Specifically, structural studies on crmA reveals this molecule lacks the D-helix as well as significant portions of the A- and E-helices.141 See also
References
|