Modeling is an essential and inseparable part of all scientific activity, and many scientific disciplines have their own ideas about specific types of modeling. There is little general theory about scientific modeling, offered by the philosophy of science, systems theory, and new fields like knowledge visualization.
Modelling is a comparatively new area of activity involving the marriage of ideas from various disciplines[1], and is an essential and inseparable part of all scientific activity. The professional modeller, according to Silvert (2001), brings special skills and techniques to bear in order to produce results that are insightful, reliable, and useful. Modeling techniques include statistical methods, computer simulation, system identification, and sensitivity analysis. None of these, however, is as important as the ability to understand the underlying dynamics of a complex system. These insights are needed to assess whether the assumptions of a model are correct and complete. The modeller must be able to recognize whether a model reflects reality, and to identify and deal with divergences between theory and data.[2]
One of the main aims of scientific modelling, according to Silvert (2001), is to apply quantitativereasoning to observations about the world, in the hope of seeing aspects that may have escaped the notice of others. Now there are many specific techniques that modelers use, which enable us to discover aspect of reality that may not be obvious to everyone. One of the essentials is the understanding of the role that assumptions play in the development of the model. The usual approach to model development is to characterize the system, make some assumptions about how it works and translate these into equations and a simulation program. After simulation one of the final steps is the validation: whether we can trust the data presented by the model.[2]
Scientific modeling basics
Model
A model in science is a physical, mathematical, or logical representation of a system of entities, phenomena, or processes. Basically a model is a simplified abstract view of the complex reality. It may focus on particular views, enforcing the "divide and conquer" principle for a compound problem.[3] Formally a model is a formalized interpretation which deals with empirical entities, phenomena, and physical processes in a mathematical, or logical way.
For the scientist, a model is also a way in which the human thought processes can be amplified. [4] Models that are rendered in software allow scientists to leverage computational power to simulate, visualize, manipulate and gain intuition about the entity, phenomenon or process being represented
A simulation is the implementation of a model over time. A simulation brings a model to life and shows how a particular object or phenomenon will behave. It is useful for testing, analysis or training where real-world systems or concepts can be represented by a model. [7]
A system is a set of interacting or interdependent entities, real or abstract, forming an integrated whole. The concept of an 'integrated whole' can also be stated in terms of a system embodying a set of relationships which are differentiated from relationships of the set to other elements, and from relationships between an element of the set and elements not a part of the relational regime.
The process of generating a model
Modeling refers to the process of generating a model as a conceptual representation of some phenomenon. Typically a model will refer only to some aspects of the phenomenon in question, and two models of the same phenomenon may be essentially different, that is in which the difference is more than just a simple renaming. This may be due to differing requirements of the model's end users or to conceptual or aesthetic differences by the modellers and decisions made during the modeling process. Aesthetic considerations that may influence the structure of a model might be the modeller's preference for a reduced ontology, preferences regarding probabilistic models vis-a-vis deterministic ones, discrete vs continuous time etc. For this reason users of a model need to understand the model's original purpose and the assumptions of its validitycitation needed.
The process of evaluating a model
A model is evaluated first and foremost by its consistency to empirical data; any model inconsistent with reproducible observations must be modified or rejected. However, a fit to empirical data alone is not sufficient for a model to be accepted as valid. Other factors important in evaluating a model include:citation needed
Ability to explain past observations
Ability to predict future observations
Ability to control events
Cost of use, especially in combination with other models
Refutability, enabling estimation of the degree of confidence in the model
Simplicity, or even aesthetic appeal
People may attempt to quantify the evaluation of a model using a utility function.
Visualization
Visualization is any technique for creating images, diagrams, or animations to communicate a message. Visualization through visual imagery has been an effective way to communicate both abstract and concrete ideas since the dawn of man. Examples from history include cave paintings, Egyptian hieroglyphs, Greek geometry, and Leonardo da Vinci's revolutionary methods of technical drawing for engineering and scientific purposes.
In business process modeling the enterprise process model is often referred to as the business process model. Process models are core concepts in the discipline of process engineering. Process models are:
Processes of the same nature that are classified together into a model.
A description of a process at the type level.
Since the process model is at the type level, a process is an instantiation of it.
The same process model is used repeatedly for the development of many applications and thus, has many instantiations.
One possible use of a process model is to prescribe how things must/should/could be done in contrast to the process itself which is really what happens. A process model is roughly an anticipation of what the process will look like. What the process shall be will be determined during actual system development.[10]
One application of scientific modeling is the field of "Modeling and Simulation", generally referred to as "M&S".[11] M&S has a spectrum of applications which range from concept development and analysis, through experimentation, measurement and verification, to disposal analysis. Projects and programs may use hundreds of different simulations, simulators and model analysis tools.
Example of the integrated use of Modelling and Simulation in Defence life cycle management. The modeling and simulation in this image is represented in the center of the image with the three containers.[7]
The figure shows how Modelling and Simulation is used as a central part of an integrated program in a Defence capability development process.[7]
^ Pullan, Wendy (2000). Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521782589.
^ C. Rolland, Modeling the Requirements Engineering Process, 3rd European-Japanese Seminar on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, Budapest, Hungary, June 1993.
^ C. Rolland and C. Thanos Pernici, A Comprehensive View of Process Engineering. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference CAiSE'98, B. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1413, Pisa, Italy, Springer, June 1998.
^ Because "Modeling and Simulation" is frequently taught in male dominated undergraduate environments, this field of application is deliberately named "Modeling and Simulation", rather than "Simulation and Modeling", to avoid distractions which may arise due to any possible association with the negative connotations of S&M.citation needed
Further reading
Nowadays there are some 40 magazines about scientific modeling which offer all kinds of international forums. Since the 1960s there is a strong growing amount of books and magazines about specific forms of scientific modeling. There is also a lot of discussion about scientific modeling in the philosophy-of-science literature. A selection:
C. West Churchman (1968). The Systems Approach, New York: Dell Publishing.
William Silvert (2001). "Modelling as a Discipline". In: Int. J. General Systems Vol. 30(3), pp. 261-282.
Roman Frigg and Stephan Hartmann (2006). "Models in Science". In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006.
Rainer Hegselmann, Ulrich Müller and Klaus Troitzsch (eds.) (1996). Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View. Theory and Decision Library. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Paul Humphreys (2004). Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fritz Rohrlich (1990). "Computer Simulations in the Physical Sciences". In: Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, edited by Arthur Fine et al., 507-518. East Lansing: The Philosophy of Science Association.
Rainer Schnell (1990). "Computersimulation und Theoriebildung in den Sozialwissenschaften". In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 1, 109-128.
Sergio Sismondo and Snait Gissis (eds.) (1999). Modeling and Simulation. Special Issue of Science in Context 12.
Eric Winsberg (2001). "Simulations, Models and Theories: Complex Physical Systems and their Representations". In: Philosophy of Science 68 (Proceedings): 442-454.
Eric Winsberg (2003). "Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World". In: Philosophy of Science 70: 105–125.