Identifying with AdigamanThe identity of the Satyaputras has long been an unanswered question in the history of Tamil Nadu. In a Tamil-Brahmi inscription found at Jambai, in the South Arcot district of Tamil Nadu, has given some clues to the identity of the Satyaputras. SATIYAPUTO ATIYAN NETUMAN ANCI CEYIVITTA PALI - This record settles the issue of who the Satyaputras, mentioned by Asoka, were. That they were the Atiyamans, a feudatory chiefs mentioned in the Sangam classics is beyond doubt. 1 The inscription assignable to first century CE, mentions the Atiya Chief Nedumam Anci, a hero celebrated in the Sangam classics. It is known that Asoka, mentions Satyaputras in his inscriptions along with the Cholas, Pandyas and Kerala putras. The Satyaputras wielded sufficient power in the time of Asoka (3rd century BCE) almost on par with the Cheras, Cholas and Pandyas. However the Atiyaman, mentioned in the Jambai record is assignable to first century CE, and probably was a descendent of the dynasty. 2 The inscription records the endowment of a cave-shelter by the chieftain Atiyan Netuman Anci who sports the title Satiyaputo. The inscription gives the name of his clan (Atiyan), of his father (Netuman) and of himself (Anci). This clear statement enables researchers with absolute certainty, to identify a chieftain mentioned in the Tamil Sangam literature with a personage figuring in a Tamil-Brahmi inscription. 3 The inscription attributed to a period later than the Mauryan emperor Asoka (304 BC–232 BCE), reads: Satiyaputo Atiyan Nedumaan Anjji itta Paali ('The abode given by Atiyan Nedumaan Anji, the Satyaputra'). Scholars have connected this short epigraph with the more famous Asokan inscription mentioning the southern kingdoms outside the Asokan empire, which reads:
See alsoNotes
References
| |