Upon completing his studies, Kirk took up an academic position at his alma mater, Michigan State. He resigned in 1959, after having become disenchanted with that university's academic standards, rapid growth in student numbers, and emphasis on intercollegiate athletics and technical training at the expense of the traditional liberal arts. Thereafter he referred to Michigan State as "Cow College" or "Behemoth University." He later wrote that academic political scientists and sociologists were "as a breed--dull dogs."[1] Late in life, he taught one semester a year at Hillsdale College, where he was Distinguished Visiting Professor of Humanities.
Kirk frequently published in two American conservative journals he helped found, National Review in 1955 and Modern Age in 1957. He was the founding editor of the latter, 1957-59. Later he was made a Distinguished Fellow of the Heritage Foundation, where he gave a number of lectures.[2]
After leaving Michigan State, Kirk returned to his ancestral home in Mecosta, Michigan, where he wrote the many books, academic articles, lectures, and the syndicated newspaper column (which ran for 13 years) by which he exerted his influence on American politics and intellectual life. In 1963, Kirk married Annette Courtemanche; they had four daughters. She and Kirk became known for their hospitality, welcoming many political, philosophical, and literary figures in their Mecosta house (known as "Piety Hill"), and giving shelter to political refugees, hoboes, and others. Their home became the site of a sort of seminar on conservative thought for university students. Piety Hill now houses the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal.
Kirk declined to drive, calling cars "mechanical Jacobins", and would have nothing to do with television and what he called "electronic computers."
Russel Kirk converted to Catholicism in 1963.
Ideas
The Conservative Mind
The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Santayana[3], the published version of Kirk's doctoral dissertation, contributed materially to the 20th century Burke revival. It also drew attention to:
The Portable Conservative Reader (1982), which Kirk edited, contains sample writings by most of the above.
Not everyone agreed with Kirk's reading of the conservative heritage and tradition. For example, Harry Jaffa (a student of Leo Strauss) wrote: "Kirk was a poor Burke scholar. Burke's attack on metaphysical reasoning related only to modern philosophy's attempt to eliminate skeptical doubt from its premises and hence from its conclusions."[4]
Russello (2004) argues that Kirk adapted what 19th century American Catholic thinker Orestes Brownson called "territorial democracy" to articulate a version of federalism that was based on premises that differ in part from those of the Founders and other conservatives. Kirk further believed that territorial democracy could reconcile the tension between treating the states as mere provinces of the central government, and as autonomous political units independent of Washington. Finally, territorial democracy allowed Kirk to set out a theory of individual rights grounded in the particular historical circumstances of the United States, while rejecting a universal conception of such rights.
Principles
Kirk developed six "canons" of conservatism, which Russello (2004) described as follows:
A belief in a transcendent order, which Kirk described variously as based in tradition, divine revelation, or natural law;
An affection for the "variety and mystery" of human existence;
A conviction that society requires orders and classes that emphasize "natural" distinctions;
A belief that property and freedom are closely linked;
A faith in custom, convention, and prescription, and
A recognition that innovation must be tied to existing traditions and customs, which entails a respect for the political value of prudence.
Kirk said that Christianity and Western Civilization are "unimaginable apart from one another." [5] and that "all culture arises out of religion. When religious faith decays, culture must decline, though often seeming to flourish for a space after the religion which has nourished it has sunk into disbelief." [6]
Kirk and Libertarianism
Kirk grounded his Burkean conservatism in tradition, political philosophy, belles lettres, and the strong religious faith of his later years; rather than libertarianism and free market economic reasoning. The Conservative Mind hardly mentions economics at all.
In a polemic essay, Kirk (quoting T. S. Eliot) called libertarians "chirping sectaries," adding that they and conservatives have nothing in common. He called the libertarian movement "an ideological clique forever splitting into sects still smaller and odder, but rarely conjugating." He said a line of division exists between believers in "some sort of transcendent moral order" and "utilitarians admitting no transcendent sanctions for conduct." He included libertarians in the latter category.[5][6] Kirk, therefore, questioned the "fusionism" between libertarians and traditional conservatives that marked much of post World War II conservatism in the United States.[7]
Kirk's view of "classical liberals" is positive though; he agrees with them on "ordered liberty" as they make "common cause with regular conservatives against the menace of democratic despotism and economic collectivism."[8]
Tibor R. Machan defended libertarianism in response to Kirk's original Heritage Lecture. Machan argued that the right of individual sovereignty is perhaps most worthy of conserving from the American political heritage, and that when conservatives themselves talk about preserving some tradition, they cannot at the same time claim a disrespectful distrust of the individual human mind, of rationalism itself.[9]
Late in life, Kirk grew disenchanted with American neoconservatives as well. On December 15, 1988, he gave a lecture at the Heritage Foundation, titled "The Neoconservatives: An Endangered Species." As Chronicles editor Scott Richert describes it,
[One line] helped define the emerging struggle between neoconservatives and paleoconservatives. "Not seldom has it seemed," Kirk declared, "as if some eminent Neoconservatives mistook Tel Aviv for the capital of the United States." A few years later, in another Heritage Foundation speech, Kirk repeated that line verbatim. In the wake of the Gulf War, which he had opposed, he clearly understood that those words carried even greater meaning.[7]
Midge Decter, director of the Committee for the Free World, called Kirk's line "a bloody outrage, a piece of anti-Semitism by Kirk that impugns the loyalty of neoconservatives." [11] She told The New Republic, "It's this notion of a Christian civilization. You have to be part of it or you're not really fit to conserve anything. That's an old line and it's very ignorant."[8]
Samuel Francis called Kirk's "Tel Aviv" remark "a wisecrack about the slavishly pro-Israel sympathies among neoconservatives.[12]
Man of letters
Kirk's more important books include Eliot and his Age: T. S. Eliot's Moral Imagination in the Twentieth Century (1972), The Roots of American Order (1974), and the autobiographical Sword of the Imagination: Memoirs of a Half Century of Literary Conflict (1995). As was the case with his hero Edmund Burke, Kirk became renowned for the prose style of his intellectual and polemical writings.[13]
His first novel, Old House of Fear (1961, 1965), as with so many of his short stories, was written in a self-consciously gothic vein, in this case concerning an American who plunges into a remote and ominous locale in Scotland. This was Kirk's most popular and lucrative fiction book, and helped support much of his later writing. He followed that with A Creature of the Twilight (1966)—a dark satire of postcolonialAfricanpolitics—and later with a dense haunted house novel, Lord of the Hollow Dark (1979, 1989). Kirk also oversaw the publication of three collections of all his short stories during his lifetime. (Three other collections have been published since his death, but they add no more stories.) One striking feature of his novels and stories is how certain characters tend to recur from one work to the next, helping provide his fictional canon with a heightened sense of unity and meaningfulness.
Having begun to write fiction in fairly early in his career, Kirk appears to have abandoned its pursuit after the early 1980s, instead devoting his last decade to nonfiction projects.
Revised edition, Front Royal, VA: Christendom Press, 1989
Two changes distinguish this from the original edition:
Kirk’s 1967 story “Balgrummo’s Hell” is added as a prologue, under the heading “Prolegomenon: Balgrummo’s Hell”, placed before the numbered chapters of the novel
”Acknowledgements” respecting this revised edition are placed at the end of the book
Individual short stories
Listed alphabetically, with first publication noted for each:
Specially written specially for this collection and not to be mistaken for the essay with the same name reprinted in Kirk’s earlier story collection The Surly Sullen Bell
Eleven stories (including one that is accidentally incomplete):
“The Surly Sullen Bell”
“Behind the Stumps”
“Sorworth Place”
“Balgrummo’s Hell”
“There’s a Long, Long Trail A-Winding”
“Saviourgate”
“Off the Sand Road”
“Fate’s Purse”
A passage of this story is omitted due to a production error in the this volume
That omission was later remedied in the subsequent companion volume by reprinting the story in its entirety as an appendix
“The Princess of All Lands”
“An Encounter by Mortstone Pond”
“Lex Talionis”
Essay (“A Cautionary Note on the Ghostly Tale”)
Reprinted from the preface with the same title in Kirk’s 1984 story collection Watchers at the Strait Gate, and not to be mistaken for the essay of the same name reprinted in Kirk’s 1962 short story collection The Surly Sullen Bell
Reprinted from the preface of the same title in Kirk’s 1984 story collection Watchers at the Strait Gate, and not to be mistaken for the essay of the same name reprinted in Kirk’s 1962 story collection The Surly Sullen Bell
^ Many published in his The Politics of Prudence (1993) and Redeeming the Time (1998).
^ Which went into 7 editions, the later ones with the title The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot. Regnery Publishing. 7th edition (2001). ISBN 0-89526-171-5
^ She claimed that Kirk "said people like my husband and me put the interest of Israel before the interest of the United States, that we have a dual loyalty."[1] Decter is the spouse of Norman Podhoretz.
^ "[2] He called Decter's response untrue, [3] "reckless" and "vitriolic." Furthermore, he argued that such a denunciation "always plays into the hands of the left, which is then able to repeat the charges and claim conservative endorsement of them." [4]
Attarian, John, 1998, "Russell Kirk's Political Economy," Modern Age 40: 87-97. Issn: 0026-7457.
Brown, Charles (1981). Russell Kirk: A Bibliography. Central Michigan University: Clarke Historical Library.
John P. East, 1984, "Russell Kirk as a Political Theorist: Perceiving the Need for Order in the Soul and in Society," Modern Age 28: 33-44. Issn: 0026-7457 .
Kirk, Russell, 1995. The Sword of Imagination: Memoirs of a Half-Century of Literary Conflict. Kirk's memoirs.
McDonald, W. Wesley, 1982. The Conservative Mind of Russell Kirk: `The Permanent Things' in an Age of Ideology. Ph.D. dissertation, The Catholic University of America. Citation: DAI 1982 43(1): 255-A. DA8213740. Online at ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
--------, 1983, "Reason, Natural Law, and Moral Imagination in the Thought of Russell Kirk," Modern Age 27: 15-24. Issn: 0026-7457.
--------, 2004. "Russell Kirk and The Age of Ideology." University of Missouri Press.
--------, 1999. "Russell Kirk and the Prospects for Conservatism," Humanitas XII: 56-76.
--------, 2006. "Kirk, Russell (1918-94)," in "American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia". ISI Books: 471-474. Biographical entry.
Nash, George H., 1998. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America.
Person, Jr., James E., 1999. "Russell Kirk: A Critical Biography of a Conservative Mind". Madison Books.
Russello, Gerald J., 1996, "The Jurisprudence of Russell Kirk," Modern Age 38: 354-63. Issn: 0026-7457. Reviews Kirk's writings on law, 1976-93, exploring his notion of natural law, his emphasis on the importance of the English common law tradition, and his theories of change and continuity in legal history.
--------, 2007. "The Postmodern Imagination of Russell Kirk". University of Missouri Press.
--------, 1999, "Time and Timeless: the Historical Imagination of Russell Kirk," Modern Age 41: 209-19. Issn: 0026-7457.
--------, 2004, "Russell Kirk and Territorial Democracy," Publius 34: 109-24. Issn: 0048-5950.
Whitney, Gleaves, 2001, "The Swords of Imagination: Russell Kirk's Battle with Modernity," Modern Age 43: 311-20. Issn: 0026-7457. Argues that Kirk used five "swords of imagination": historical, political, moral, poetic, and prophetic.