The Reichstag Fire Decree of February 28, 1933The most prominent example in history is the Reichstag Fire Decree, in which German President Paul von Hindenburg was convinced by Adolf Hitler to issue a decree suspending basic civil rights indefinitely. As a result of this decree, Nazi authorities were able to constitutionally suppress or imprison their opposition, which in turn paved the way for the one-party rule of the Third Reich. As Giorgio Agamben points out, the ensuing state of exception, which suspended the Constitution without repealing it, lasted until the end of the Third Reich. Decrees in democratic regimesSome democratic leaders, such as the presidents of Mexico have the constitutional authority to issue emergency decrees, as well. The President of France may rule by decree in national emergencies, subject to constitutional and other legal limitations, but this power has been used only once. Other modern political concepts, such as the French decrees, Orders in Council in the British Commonwealth and American executive orders are partially based on this notion of decrees, although far more limited in scope, and generally subject to judicial review. Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez has been granted power by the National Assembly to rule by decree for 18 months in early 2007. He intends to nationalize Venezuela's telecommunications and power industries and end foreign ownership of oil refineries as part of his Bolivarian Revolution. During the infamous Indian Emergency from 1975-1977, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi got laws passed that allowed her to rule by decree. The emergency years were India's biggest challenge in its commitment to democracy. Giorgio Agamben's critique of the use of decrees-lawItalian philosopher Giorgio Agamben has pointed out the explosion in the use of various types of decrees (decree-law, presidential decrees, executive orders, etc.) since World War I. According to him, this is the sign of a "generalization of the state of exception". See also
| |