NamingThe document has carried many names. At the top of the original text is "Of Plimoth Plantation", but the modern spelling for Plymouth is now used. The text of Bradford's journal is often mistakenly referred to as "History of Plymouth Plantation." In Wilberforce's text it is cited as "History of the Plantation of Plymouth".1 It is also sometimes referred to as "William Bradford's Journal." A version published by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (after the return of the manuscript from England in 1897) is titled 'Bradford's History "Of Plimoth Plantation"' while labeled "The Bradford History" on the spine.2 It has also been called "The Mayflower" although it is not a ship's log and was written after the events.2 Bradford's materialBradford, along with Edward Winslow and others, contributed material to George Morton, who merged everything into a book published in London in 1622, Mourt's Relation,3 which was primarily a journal of the colonist's first years at Plymouth. Bradford’s history is a blend of fact and interpretation. The Bradford journal records not only the events of the first 30 years but also the reactions of the colonists. The Bradford journal is regarded by historians as the preeminent work of 17th century America. It is Bradford’s simple yet vivid story, as told in his journal, that has made the Pilgrims the much-loved "spiritual ancestors of all Americans" (Samuel Eliot Morison). Bradford apparently never made an effort to publish the manuscript during his lifetime. He did intend for it to be preserved and read by others, writing at the end of chapter 6:
Bradford, like all writers of his time, uses a variety of spelling. A rule code for spelling was unknown then and dictionaries uncommon. Consistency in spelling was not a virtue, even important state papers might reflect regional speech. In addition, there were a number of particular customs used, as for example the f-shaped s which was used when the letter s was doubled or used initially. Bradford also uses common abbreviations such as wt for with, and yt for that. History of the manuscriptIn the years following his death, the manuscript was referenced by several New England historians, including Bradford's nephew Nathaniel Morton who published New England's Memorial in 1669. After remaining in the hands of the Bradford family for nearly a century, the manuscript passed to the Reverend Thomas Prince who used it in his writing of Chronological History in 1736.5 After Prince's death, the manuscript was left in the tower of the Old South Meeting House in Boston. During the Revolutionary War, British troops occupied the church and the manuscript was lost for another century. After quotes from the missing book appeared in Samuel Wilberforce's A History of the Protestant Episcopal Church in America, in the 1850s it was discovered in the Bishop of London's library at Fulham Palace,2 and was published in print in 1856. Formal proposals to return the manuscript were not successful until the 1897 initiative of the Hon. George Hoar, United States Senator from Massachusetts, supported by the Pilgrim Society, the American Antiquarian Society, and the New England Society of New York. When Bishop of London Frederick Temple learned of the importance of the book, he thought it should be returned but because it was being held by the Church that approval from the Archbishop of Canterbury was needed. By the time the formal request from Hoar's group reached England, the Archbishop was Frederick Temple. The bishop's Consistorial and Episcopal Court of London observed that although how the book got there was not known, the marriage and birth registry in the back of the book should have been deposited with the Church, that this library was the proper place for it, thus the book was a church document and the Diocese of London had proper control of it. The court went on to observe that when the Colony declared independence in 1776, the Diocese of London was no longer the proper place because London's registry was no longer the proper repository for such a registry. The bishop's court ordered that a photographic copy of the document be made for the court, and the original be delivered to the Governor of Massachusetts.2 The Bradford journal was presented to the Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts during a joint session of the legislature on May 26, 1897. It is on deposit in the State Library in the State House in Boston. In June 1897 the state legislature ordered publication of the history with copies of the documents associated with the return.2 In 1912, the Massachusetts Historical Society published a "final" authorized version of the text. Early in the 16th century, rag-based paper replaced parchment book pages. Both parchment and rag paper are very durable. Documents from the 17th century usually outlast those written on the highly acidic 19th and 20th century wood pulp-based paper. William Bradford's manuscript journal is a vellum-bound volume measuring 11 1/2" by 7 3/4." There are 270 pages, numbered (sometimes inaccurately) by Bradford himself. The ink is slightly faded and has turned brown with age, but it is still completely legible. The pages are somewhat foxed (discolored) but otherwise the almost 400-year-old document is in remarkably good condition. Page 243 is missing, with a note from Thomas Prince that it was missing when he got the document.2 From the journal(Describing the Pilgrims' safe arrival at Cape Cod aboard the Mayflower)
See alsoReferences
External links
| |