Development of the river rerouting projectsThe project of turning some of the flow of the northern rivers to the south was discussed, on a smaller scale, as early as the 1930s. In November 1933, a special conference of the USSR Academy of Sciences approved a plan for a "reconstruction of the Volga and its basin", which included the diversion into the Volga of some of the waters of the Pechora and the Northern Dvina - two rivers in the north of European Russia that flow into the seas of the Arctic Ocean. Research in that direction was then conducted by the Hydroproject, the dam and canal institute led by Sergey Yakovlevich Zhuk (Russian: Сергей Яковлевич Жук). Some design plans were developed by Zhuk's institute, but without either much publicity or actual construction work. 3 In January 1961, several years after Zhuk's death, Nikita Khrushchev presented a memo authored by Zhuk and another engineer, G.Russo, about the river rerouting plan to the Central Committee of the CPSU.3 Despite the ousting of Khrushchev in 1964, talks about the projects of turning the major rivers Pechora, Kama, Tobol, Ishim, Irtysh, and Ob resumed in the late 1960s.4 Some 120 institutes and agencies participated in the impact study coordinated by the Academy of Sciences; a dozen of conferences were held on the matter. The promoters of the project claimed that extra food production due to the availability of Siberian water for the irrigation in Central Asia could provide food for some 200,000,000 people.3 The plans involved not only irrigation but also the replenishing of the shrinking Aral Sea and Caspian Sea. In 1971, at a meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna the Soviets disclosed information about successful earthworks on the route of the Pechora-Kama Canal using detonations of three 15-kiloton nuclear devices spaced 500 feet apart, claiming negligible radioactive fallout.1 However, no further construction work, nuclear or otherwise, was conducted on that canal. Criticism of the project and its abandonmentThe project was heavily criticized by many academics, writers, and journalists, in particular for its environmental costs, and eventually abandoned in mid-1980s. The final nail in its coffin was the Resolution of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the CPSU "On the Cessation of the Work on the Partial Flow Transfer of Northern and Siberian Rivers", passed in 1986.5 Calls for resumption of the projectIn early 21st century talks about river reversal were renewed by the leaders of both Uzbekistan6 and Kazakhstan.7 These proposals met an enthusiastic response from one of Russia's most influential politicians, Moscow mayor Luzhkov8. See alsoReferences
| |