BiographyLittle is known about the Mongol general, except that he took part in some Mongol campaigns between 1299 and 1303. 1299-1300 campaign
Victory of the Mongols (left) over the Mamluks (right) at the 1299 Battle of Homs
In 1299, the Mongol Ilkhanate ruler Ghazan marched with his generals Mulay and Samagar towards Egyptian Mamluk-controlled Syria. The Mongols successfully took the city of Aleppo, and then defeated the Mamluks in the Battle of Wadi al-Khazandar, on December 23 or 24, 1299.[2] At some point, Ghazan ordered Mulay to lead a raid through Palestine, with a tumen, a force of 10,000-20,000 horsemen.[3] Mulay's group split off from Ghazan's army,[4] and pursued the retreating Mamluk troops as far as Gaza, pushing them back to Egypt.[2][5][6] The bulk of Ghazan's forces then proceeded on to Damascus, which surrendered at some point between December 30, 1299, and January 6, 1300, though its Citadel resisted.[7] Ghazan then retreated with most of his forces in February, probably because the Mongol horses needed fodder. He promised to return in November to attack Egypt.[6] Mulay and his horsemen returned to Damascus around March 1300,[8] and followed Ghazan back across the Euphrates. In May 1300, the Egyptian Mamluks returned from Egypt and reclaimed the entire area[9] without a battle.[10] 1303 offensiveIn 1303, the Mongols, led by Ghazan's generals Mulay and Kutlushah, reappeared in great strength in Syria (about 80,000) together with the Armenians.[11] However, they were defeated at Homs on March 30, 1303, and also at the decisive Battle of Shaqhab, south of Damascus, on April 21, 1303.[11] It is considered to be the last major Mongol invasion of Syria.[12] Mulay/Molay controversy
"Jacques Molay takes Jerusalem, 1299", a painting created in the 1800s by Claude Jacquand, and hanging in the "Hall of Crusades" in Versailles. In reality, though the Mongols may have been technically in control of the city for a few months in early 1300 (since no other troops were in the area), De Molay was almost certainly on the island of Cyprus at that time, nowhere near the landlocked city of Jerusalem, and there is no record of any major battle for Jerusalem in 1299.
The 13th century historian Templar of Tyre (assistant to the Knights Templar on Cyprus), wrote of the 1300 offensive:
The Molay mentioned by the Templar of Tyre has sometimes been confused with the contemporary Grand Master of the Knights Templar Jacques de Molay, but modern historians agree that it instead designates the Mongol general "Mûlay".[14] This confusion, however, lasted several centuries, and was even expanded in the 19th century to claims that Jerusalem had been captured by the Mongols, with Jacques de Molay in charge of one of the Mongol divisions.[14] Some of this confusion resulted from abundant rumors which had circulated in 1300 that Jerusalem had been captured by the Mongols. The reports turned out to be false, but the inadvertently false documents, when reviewed out of context, continued to fuel confusion (see Mongol raids into Palestine#European rumors about Jerusalem). In 1805, the French historian/playwright Raynouard said, "In 1299, the Grand-Master was with his knights at the taking of Jerusalem."[15] In the 1861 edition of the French encyclopedia, the Nouvelle Biographie Universelle, it says in the "Molay" article:
There is even a painting, Molay Prend Jerusalem, 1299 ("Molay Takes Jerusalem, 1299"), hanging in the French national museum in Versailles, created in 1846 by Claude Jacquand,[16] which depicts the supposed event in 1299. Some modern writers, such as the contrarian historian Laurent Dailliez (Les Templiers) and the novelist of popular pseudohistory Robert Payne (The Dream and the Tomb), as well as various Templar-related websites, still consider that the Templar of Tyre's Molay was Jacques de Molay himself, and attribute all of Mulay's deeds, as well as rumors of his deeds, to the Grand Master. Notes
References
Recommended reading
| |