This article is about the Mongoloid race. For the song by Devo, see Mongoloid (song).
The term "Mongoloid" is a variation of the word "Mongol", meaning "Mongol-like". It has been coined as a racial category to describe the distinctive appearance of East Asian peoples. Today it is most used in discussions of human prehistory, historical definitions of race and in the forensic analysis of human remains. The concept's existence is based on a now disputed typological method of racial classification.[1][2] In forensics, Mongoloid is considered a skull type that is used to determine the probable soft-tissue reconstruction of discovered human remains. The -oid racial terms are now often controversial in both technical and non-technical contexts and may sometimes give offense no matter how they are used.[3] This is especially true of "Mongoloid" because it has also been used as a synonym for persons with Down Syndrome, and in American English as a generic insult meaning "idiot".[4] Contrary to popular beliefs, Mongoloid refers to diverse ethnical groups, instead of a homogeneous group.
Populations included
Thomas Huxley's map of racial categories from On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind. The Mongoloid group appears orange at what Huxley believed to be its point of origin, and radiates over Asia and America in variant forms, signified by color changes from pale orange to green to green-brown
The term comes from the Mongolian people of East Asia, who had a reputation in Europe for ruthless expansionism and massacre of enemy populations. The first usage of the term "Mongolian race" was by Christoph Meiners in a "binary racial scheme" of "two races" with the Caucasian whose racial purity was exemplified by the "venerated... ancient Germans" with some Europeans being impure "dirty whites" and "Mongolians" who consisted of everyone else.[5] The term "Mongolian" was borrowed from Meiners by Johann Blumenbach to describe "second [race], [which] includes that part of Asia beyond the Ganges and below the river Amoor Amur, which looks toward the south, together with the islands and the greater part of these countries which is now called Australian." [6] In 1861, Isid Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire added the "Australian" as a "secondary race" (subrace) of the "principal race" of "Mongolian"[7] In the nineteenth century Georges Cuvier used the term "Mongolian" again as a racial classification, but additionally included American Indians under the term.[8] Later, Thomas Huxley used the term "Mongoloid" and included American Indians as well as Arctic Native Americans.[9] Other nomenclatures were proposed, such as "Mesochroi" (middle color),[10] but "Mongoloid" was widely adopted. In 1915, "anthropologist Arthur de Gobineau"[11] defined the extent of the "Mongolian" race, "by the yellow the Altaic, Mongol, Finnish and Tartar branches."[12] In the 20th century, Carleton S. Coon used the term and included Pacific Islanders.[13] In 1983, Futuyma claimed that the inclusion of Native Americans and Pacific Islanders under the Mongoloid race was not recognized by "many anthropologists" who consider them "distinct races".[14] For example, in 1984, Roger J. Lederer Professor of Biological Sciences[15] separately listed the "Mongoloid" race from Pacific islanders and American Indians when he enumerated the "geographical varients of the same species known as races...we recognize several races Eskimos, American Indians, Mongoloid... Polynesian"[16]. Another term was introduced by noted ethnologist Dr.MWSpanakos of New York City, the usage of "Mongolasian", and has gain great popularity. Origins
The 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso in 2007
In 1865, Thomas Huxley presented the views of polygenecists of which Huxley was not as "some imagine their assumed species of mankind were created where we find them... the Mongolians from the Orangs."[17] In 1897, WEB DuBois, sociologist and historian, said, "[t]he final word of science, so far, is that we have at least two perhaps three, great families of human beings -- the whites and Negroes, possibly the yellow race [he calls this "Mongolian" later][18]. The other races have arisen from the intermingling of the blood of these two." [18] Later, there was a "change in his anthropological view", where he postulated "Negroids and Mongoloids are primary, with Caucasoids listed as a type between these, possibly formed by their union, with bleached skin and intermediate hair."[18] In 1972, Carleton Coon claimed, "[f]rom a hyborean [sic] group there evolved, in northern Asia, the ancestral strain of the entire specialized mongoloid family."[19] In 1962, Coon believed that the Mongoloid "subspecies" existed "during most of the Pleistocene, from 500,000 to 10,000 years ago".[20] According to Coon, the Mongoloid race had not completed its "invasions and expansions" into Southeast Asia, the Americas, and the Pacific Islands until "[t]oward the end of the Pleistocene"[20] By this time Coon hypothesis that the Mongoloid race had become "sapien".[20] Polynesians are seen as part Africoid due to the admixture of Australoid and Mongoloid characteristics. M.K Bhasin's review article (referencing Mourant 1983) suggests that "The Caucasoids and the Mongoloids almost certainly became differentiated from one another somewhere in Asia" and that "Another differentiation, which probably took place in Asia, is that of the Australoids, perhaps from a common type before the separation of the Mongoloids." [21] Dr. T. Tirado claims that "many experts" consider American Indians and East Asians to be descended from a "Proto-Mongoloid" population which existed as late as 12,000 years ago.[22] See also: Models of migration to the New World Futuyma believes the Mongoloid race "diverged 41,000 years ago" from a Mongoloid and Caucasoid group which diverged from Negroids "110,000 years ago".[14] Peter Brown (1999) evaluates three sites with early East Asian modern human skeletal remains (Liujiang, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China; Zhoukoudian's Upper Cave; and Minatogawa in Okinawa) dated to between 10,175 to 33,200 years ago, and finds lack of support for the conventional designation of skeletons from this period as "Proto-Mongoloid"; this would make Neolithic sites 5500 to 7000 years ago (e.g. Banpo) the oldest known Mongoloid remains in East Asia, younger than some in the Americas. He concludes that the origin of the Mongoloid phenotype remains unknown, and could even lie in the New World.[23] A 2006 study of linkage disequilibrium finds that northern populations in East Asia started to expand in number between 34 and 22 thousand years ago (KYA), before the last glacial maximum at 21–18 KYA, while southern populations started to expand between 18 and 12 KYA, but then grew faster, and suggests that the northern populations expanded earlier because they could exploit the abundant megafauna of the ‘‘Mammoth Steppe,’’ while the southern populations could increase in number only when a warmer and more stable climate led to more plentiful plant resources such as tubers.[24] SubracesBhavan identifies Northeast India Mongoloids to be a subrace called the "Paleo-Mongoloid", being the "dominant element in the tribes living in Assam and the Indo-Burmese frontiers... Sikkim and Bhutan... [and] Tibetan mongoloids"[25] In 1900, Joseph Deniker said, the "Mongol race admits two varieties or subraces: Tunguse or Northern Mongolian... and Southern Mongolian"[7] The people of East Asia are called "Northern Mongoloids".[26] Archaeologist Peter Bellwood claims that the "vast majority" of people in Southeast Asia, the region he calls the "clinal Mongoloid-Australoid zone", are "Southern Mongoloids" but have a "high degree" of Australoid admixture. [27] Ainus are considered Southern Mongoloids even though they live in East Asia.[26] Sinodonty and Sundadonty are dentition patterns that correspond to the Northern Mongoloid vs. Southern Mongoloid distinction. Features17th century anthropologist Christoph Meiners, one of the first people to define the "Mongolian race", characterized the "Mongolian race" as being "weak in body... dark...[and] ugly".[5] Anthropologist Johann Blumenbach, Meiners contemporary, described the "Mongolian race" as "Men of dark colour, snub noses, with winking eye-lids drawn outwards at the corners, scanty and stiff hair"[6] with skin of "yellow, olive-tinge, a sort of colour half-way between grains of wheat and cooked oranges, or the dry and exsiccated rind of lemons"[6] In 1907, anthropologist William Crooke described the Mongoloid as having a, "yellow-complexion, narrow slant eyes, small eyes, laterally prominant malar bones, black lank hair, and short stature... the face is broad and flat, nose depressed, eye oblique, no beard, but a little mustache, complexion olive[29]... The total absence of a beard... gives the males somewhat an effeminate appearance." [29] In 1915, "anthropologist Arthur de Gobineau"[11] described the "Mongolian" as "yellowish skin, scanty hair and beard, a large face, a pyrimidal skull, small stature, thick-set limbs, and slanting eyes with skin on the eyelids turned so much outwards that the eye will hardly open-- we recognize a very well-marked type, the main features of which it is easy to bear in mind The skull points forward, not backward. The forehead is wide and bony, often high and projecting. The shape of the face is triangular, the nose and chin showing none of the coarse protuberences that marks the negro. There is further a general proneness to obesity."[12]. Skull shape is typically rounder than that of Caucasoids and Negroids, with higher-set cheekbones. Faces are relatively broader and flatter, while noses are typically smaller with lower bridges and minimal projection. Body hair is scarce and sweat glands are also fewer. Nevertheless, differing characteristics from these may also occur. [30] In 1898, ethnographer Friedrich Ratzel described "Dravidian[s]" by "dark colour, Mongolian features, smooth hair"[31] Forensic anthropologist Caroline Wilkenson says that Austaloids have the largest brow ridges "with moderate to large supraorbital arches".[32] Caucasoids have the second largest brow ridges with "moderate supraorbital ridges".[32] Negroids have the third largest brow ridges with an "undulating supraorbital ridge".[32] Mongoloids are "absent browridges", so they have the smallest brow ridges.[32] Proto MongoloidsThe physical features of the "Proto-Mongoloid" were characterized as, "a straight-haired type, medium in complexion, jaw protrusion, nose-breadth, and incliniing probably to round-headedness".[33] Kanzō Umehara considers the Ainu and Ryukyuans to have "preserved their proto-Mongoloid traits". [34] Variation in traits between groupsVariation in traits can be rather considerable between certain groups due to climatic variation, the most apparent of these differences concern the shape of the skull, the constitution of the body and the colour of the skin. UsageQuestionable usefulnessGeneticist Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza claims that there is a genetic division between East and Southeast Asians.[35] In a like manner, Zhou Jixu agrees that there is a physical difference between these two populations.[36] Other geneticists have found evidence for three separate populations, carrying distinct sets of non-recombining Y chromosome lineages, within the traditional Mongoloid category: North Asians, Han Chinese/Southeast Asians, and Japanese.[37] The complexity of genetic data have led to doubt about the usefulness of the concept of a Mongoloid race itself, since distinctive East Asian features may represent separate lineages and arise from environmental adaptations or retention of common proto-Eurasian ancestral characteristics.[38] Many scholars claim Austronesians are admixtures of Australoids, a group which includes Veddoids, Australians, Negritos and Papuans; with Mongoloids.[39] Down's SyndromeSince people with Down syndrome may have epicanthic folds, the condition was formerly called "Mongol" or "Mongoloid Idiocy"[40] Mistakenly, John Langdon Down, for whom the syndrome was named, claimed in his book Observations on the Ethnic Classification of Idiots (1866), that the Mongol-like features represented an alleged evolutionary degeneration when manifested in Caucasoids. Though this view was discounted in the 20th century, the use of the term "Mongoloid" for racial purposes has acquired offensive connotations because of the connection with Down syndrome. See alsoReferences
| |