Mass customization, in marketing, manufacturing, and management, is the use of flexible computer-aided manufacturing systems to produce custom output. Those systems combine the low unit costs of mass production processes with the flexibility of individual customization. The concept of mass customization is attributed to Stan Davis in Future Perfect[1] and was defined by Tseng and Jiao (2001, p. 685) as "producing goods and services to meet individual customer's needs with near mass production efficiency". Kaplan and Haenlein (2006, pp. 168–182) concurred, calling it "a strategy that creates value by some form of company-customer interaction at the fabrication / assembly stage of the operations level to create customized products with production cost and monetary price similar to those of mass-produced products".
VariantsJoseph Pine II (1992) described four types of mass customization:
He suggested a business model, "the 8.5-figure-path", a process going from invention to mass production to continuous improvement to mass customization and back to invention. ImplementationMany implementations of mass customization are operational today, such as software-based product configurators which make it possible to add and/or change functionalities of a core product or to build fully custom enclosures from scratch. This degree of mass customization has only seen limited adoption, however. If an enterprise's marketing department offers individual products (atomic market fragmentation) it doesn't often mean that a product is produced individually, but rather that similar variants of the same mass produced item are available. Companies which have succeeded with mass-customization business models tend to supply purely electronic products. However, these are not true "mass customizers" in the original sense, since they do not offer an alternative to mass production of material goods. Companies in which the production of tangible goods and services is immediately directed by consumer demand include:
Notable failuresMany industries have found that lengthy supply-chains, and the economics of configurability do not allow them to economically offer mass customization. Famously, some of the early businesses attempting mass customization (e.g. in bicycle production) went out of business. In 1999 boosters of the mass customization trend proffered Cannondale as the exemplar of the new model. For instance, a 1999 report[3] touted Cannondale's ability to mass customize:
Although the company's subsequent bankruptcy in 2003 was blamed on other causes (including a failed attempt to enter the motorsports [4]) the mass customization "revolution" certainly failed to save it, and it was dropped as a role model by some business gurus. Other business consultants used the company's business model as an example whilst it was out of business; see "The Dilbert Future" for a satirical reference. References
See also
External links
| |