Epistemological interpretationsThe conclusion that this Herodotus is really Pseudo-Herodotus places the narrator in an ethically and epistemologically reprehensible position. He has been caught not in an error but a lie, and if he lied about the authorship, how can any credibility be extended to the content of the narrative? The most skeptical interpretation is that the text is patently false. It was, in this view, written long after Herodotus' time, perhaps in the third or fourth centuries AD, when there was apparently an audience for literary pastiches, such as the Letters of Alciphron, and fraudulent attributions, as in the Historia Augusta (Lefkowitz 1981, p. 20). Thus the Life of Homer would be best treated as historical fiction. However, there appears to be a certain overlap of Pseudo-Herodotus on other works, including the Odyssey; for example, the Life mentions Phemius, a school-master, Mentes, a ship-captain, Mentor, a man of Ithaca, and Tychius, a leather-maker (Geddes 1878, p. 318). The Odyssey features Phemius, the bard, Mentes, a mariner, Mentor of Ithaca, and Tychius, a leather-worker. Moreover, some of the epigrams are in other "Lives." Strongest of all is the character of the wandering blind bard, Demodocus, in the Odyssey, who fits the characterization of Homer in the Life. The appearance of these elements can be explained by back-formation; that is, the liar manufactured stories to explain elements already known. This argument defeats its own intent, as it proves that the Life is repeating elements and is not manufacturing the whole thing de novo. The main line of scholarly thought therefore has accepted and used elements from the Life, knowing that they may be lies, since at least the time of Guillaume Bude, who "accepted Peudo-Herodotus' method and results" (Grafton 1997, p. 165). The main problem with the Life is identifying elements to which limited credibility might be extended, how limited, and why. For example, one reason for some credibility is that all the "Lives" were "compiled from the Alexandrian period onward but sometimes incorporating stories from the classical age" (Kirk 1965, p. 190). ContentIngeniously linking the famous poet with various places that figure prominently in his works and in well-known legends about him, the Life depicts Homer as the illegitimate son of Cretheis of Argos and his ward, who was the daughter of Melanopus of Cyme in Aeolis (Asia Minor). Homer, whose name at birth was Melesigenes, was born at neighbouring Smyrna. He went with his schoolteacher on a voyage to Ithaca, where he stayed with a certain Mentor; later he would include Mentor as a character in the Odyssey as acknowledgment to his host. Already a sufferer from eye disease, Homer became blind during the return journey from Ithaca, at Colophon. He then took up poetry in order to make a living. Having failed in a bid for municipal sponsorship at Cyme, he moved to Phocaea, where another schoolteacher, Thestorides, offered him food and lodging in exchange for the right to record his poetry in writing. Homer had little choice but to accept, and recited to Thestorides the Iliad and the Odyssey. Thestorides afterwards moved to Chios, where he performed Homer's poems as if they were his own and became famous. Homer heard rumours of this and eventually travelled to Chios also, where he found work as a tutor. Thestorides retreated hastily, and it was in Chios that Homer composed those of his supposed works that were meant for children, including the Batrachomyomachia or "Battle of the Frogs and Mice". At the end of his life Homer travelled to Samos; he died at Ios in the course of a voyage to Athens. Notable featuresThe Pseudo-Herodotean Life of Homer is unique among ancient versions of the poet's life in claiming that writing was known in Homer's circle and that the poems were written down from his recital (Dalby 2006, p. 29). NotesReferences
See also
| |