Material causeMaterial cause describes the material out of which something is composed. Thus the material cause of a table is wood, and the material cause of a car is rubber and steel. Formal causeFormal cause is a concept used by Aristotle, and originates from the idea of the form by Plato and Socrates. The formal cause according to which a statue is made is the idea existing in the first place as exemplar in the mind of the sculptor, and in the second place as intrinsic, determining cause, embodied in the matter. Formal cause could only refer to the essential quality of causation. A deeper contemplation reveals a formal cause as the ever existing truth of capacity. Thus, the capacity of the human genome to accompany the existence of a human being presumes that the capacity to be a human being pre-exists the human being. That pre-existence consists of the essential capacity of the specific genome to co-exist with the human in a very significant and specific way. The dog genome does not cause a human though elements of dog genome may coexist with the human genome. A more simple example of the formal cause is the blueprint or plan that one has before making or causing a human made object to exist. Plato would say that a perfect circle exists, or the form of a perfect circle exists and that all other circles are an imperfect copy of the formal cause. Efficient causeThe efficient cause is the agent which brings something about. For example, in the case of a statue, it is the person chiseling away, and the act of chiseling, that causes the statue. This answers the question, how does it happen? It is the sort of answer we usually expect when we ask about cause; the thing which happened to bring about certain results. Final causeFinal cause or telos, is one of Aristotle's four forms of causation (the others being material, formal, and efficient). It is defined as the purpose, the good, or the end of something. For example, the final cause of a pen is decent writing. Telos is often used among many ethicists today as it reflects the ancient meaning. Final cause in scienceIn science, final causes contrast with mechanical causes, which, in Aristotle's language, mainly encompass material causes and efficient causes. Over time, many rejected the idea of a final cause, or the study of the good, because of there was too much disagreement. Niccolò Machiavelli focused mainly on the material causes, and rejected the search for final causes as too difficult for most people.citation needed Although science has historically focused mostly on material causes, there has been some discussion and exploration of final causes in a scientific context, especially when studying systems at a macroscopic level. The laws of thermodynamics can be interpreted as a final cause,[1] and this perspective is useful for explaining the spontaneous origin of new levels in a hierarchy.[2] Ecologist Robert Ulanowicz argues that positive feedback in ecosystems can have effects which appear at a local level to be the result of a final cause.[3] References
See also
| |