Climate change has become a major which? issue in Australia in recentwhen? years.[1]. Rainfall in Australia has increased over the past century, both nationwide and for all four quadrants of the nation [2]. However muchwho? of the country's population appearswhich? to be losing its traditional water sources due to an increase in population in urban areas coupled with persistent drought. At the same time, Australia continues to have the highest per capita greenhouse gas emissionscitation needed and academic studieswhich? have clearly shownwhich? the influence of fossil fuel and light metal (aluminium and titanium) industry lobby groups on the country's political system to be both strongly established and highly extensivecitation needed. All federal and state governments have explicitly recognised that climate change is being caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Sectors of the population are actively campaigning against new coal mines and coal fired power stations because of their concern about the effects of global warming on Australia while other groups are actively campaigning for coal fired power stations an an increase in both number and output of coal mines. Other sectors of the populatio believe it is still too early to tell whether or not there has actually been human induced climate change and believe the naturally high variability of Australia's climate produces too much uncertainty to warrant panic. After publication of the Garnaut draft report and the Green Paper on the proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme members of this group are increasingly viewedwho? as "Climate change skeptics"citation needed. There is expected to be a net benefit to Australia of stabilising greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at 450ppm CO2 eq [3] although the coal industry argue this propositioncitation needed.
Pre-instrumental climate changePaleoclimatic records indicate that during glacial maxima Australia was extremely arid[4], with plant pollen fossils showing deserts extending as far as northern Tasmania and a vast area of less than 2 percent vegetation cover over all of South Australia and adjacent regions of other states. Forest cover was largely limited to sheltered areas of the east coast and the extreme southwest of Western Australia. During these glacial maxima the climate was also much colder and windier than today[5]. Minimum temperatures in winter in the centre of the continent were as much as 9°C (16°F) lower than they are today. Hydrological evidence for dryness during glacial maxima can also be seen at major lakes in Victoria's Western District, which dried up between around 20,000 and 15,000 years ago and re-filled from around 12,000 years ago[6]. As one moves into the Holocene, evidence for climate change declines. During the early Holocene, there is evidence from Lake Frome in South Australia and Lake Woods near Tennant Creek that the climate between 8,000 and 9,500 years ago and again from 7,000 to 4,200 years ago it was considerably wetter than over the period of instrumental recording since about 1885[7]. The research that gave these records also suggested that the rainfall flooding Frome was definitely summer-dominant rainfall because of pollen counts from grass species. Other sources[8] suggest the Southern Oscillation may have been weaker during the early Holocene and rainfall over northern Australia less variable as well as higher. The onset of modern conditions with periodic wet season failure is dated ar around 4,000 years before the present. In southern Victoria, there is evidence for generally wet conditions except for a much drier spell between about 3,000 and 2,100 years before the present[9], when it is believed Lake Corangamite fell to levels well below those observed between European settlement and the 1990s. After this dry period, Western District lakes returned to their previous levels fairly quickly and by 1800 they were at their highest levels in the forty thousand years of record available. Elsewhere, data for most of the Holocene are deficient, largely because methods used elsewhere to determine past climates (like tree-ring data) cannot be used in Australia owing to the character of its soils and climate. Recently, however, coral cores have been used to examine rainfall over those areas of Queensland draining to the Great Barrier Reef[10]. The results do not provide conclusive evidence of man-made climate change, but do suggest the following:
A similar study, not yet published, is planned for coral reefs in Western Australia. There exist records of floods in a number of rivers, such as the Hawkesbury, from the time of first settlement. These suggest that, for the period beginning with the first European settlement, the first thirty-five years or so were wet and were followed by a much drier period up to the middle 1860s[11], when usable instrumental records start. Instrumental climate recordsDevelopment of an instrumental networkAlthough rain gauges were installed privately by some of the earliest settlers, the first instrumental climate records in Australia were not compiled until 1840 at Port Macquarie. Rain gauges were gradually installed at other major centres across the continent, with the present gauges in Melbourne and Sydney dating from 1858 and 1859 respectively. In EAST Australia, where the continent's first large-scale agriculture began, a large number of rain gauges were installed during the 1860s and by 1875 a comprehensive network had been developed in the "settled" areas of that state[12]. With the spread of the pastoral industry to the north of the continent during this period, rain gauges were established extensively in newly settled areas, reaching Darwin by 1869, Alice Springs by 1874, and the Kimberley, Channel Country and Gulf Savannah by 1880. By 1885[13], most of Australia had a network of rainfall reporting stations adequate to give a good picture of climatic variability over the continent. The exceptions were remote areas of western Tasmania, the extreme southwest of Western Australia, Cape York Peninsula[14], the northern Kimberley and the deserts of northwestern South Australia and southeastern Western Australia. In these areas good-quality climatic data were not available for quite some time after that. Temperature measurements, although made at major population centres from days of the earliest rain gauges, were generally not established when rain gauges spread to more remote locations during the 1870s and 1880s. Although they gradually caught up in number with rain gauges, many place which have had rainfall data for over 125 years have only a few decades of temperature records. Climate history based on instrumental recordsAustralia's instrumental record from 1885 to the present shows the following broad picture:
Local variationsWith respect to the patterns noted above, there have been local variations. Because of the general spatial coherence of rainfall over most of Australia, these variations have tended to affect small areas, but because these are generally the most populated parts of the continent, they are still of considerable importance.
Effects of climate change on AustraliaAccording to the CSIRO and Garnaut Climate Change Review, climate change is expected to have numerous adverse effects on many species, regions, activities and much infrastructure and areas of the economy and public health in Australia and on balance the Stern Report and Garnaut Review expect these to outweigh the costs of mitigation. [21] In June 2008 it became known that an expert panel had warned of long term, maybe irreversible, severe ecological damage for the whole Murray-Darling basin if it does not receive sufficient water by October.[22] Water restrictions are currently in place in many regions and cities of Australia in response to chronic shortages resulting from drought.[23] The Australian of the Year 2007, environmentalist Tim Flannery, predicted that unless it made drastic changes, Perth in Western Australia could become the world’s first ghost metropolis, an abandoned city with no more water to sustain its population.[24] Australian attitudes to climate changeHistorically, because of the high variability of climate in Australia, there had generally been great reluctance among both scientists and the general public to accept the viewpoint that observed medium- or long-term changes in climate are ever permanent[25]. There used generally exist a belief that if a past period has been dry, then wetter conditions will eventually return - though it is by no means unusual for those who experience wet periods when young to expect such patterns of rainfall to continue[26].
People in rural Australia who must struggle with an extremely erratic climate have traditionally been viewed as more "honest" than those who do not have to struggle with so erratic a climate, so that efforts to mitigate what are even today with increasing evidence of anthropogenic global warming are not traditionally seen in a favourable light. Highly conservative communities in outer-metropolitan areas likewise believe that reducing Australia's greenhouse gas emissions would necessarily reduce their living standards, because all essential goods (food, water, petrol etc.) would be more expensive. It is only in the last half decade that scientific bodies such as the CSIRO and Australian Bureau of Meteorology have issued reports stating that the cost of failing to act on the threat of climate change is greater than the costs of rapid mitigation. Recent sources appear to confirm beyond reasonable doubt that the persistent decline in rainfall over southwestern Australia is almost entirely anthropogenic and that only by restoring carbon dioxide to pre-industrial levels could pre-1975 rainfall be restored.[27] A 2002 poll on Australian attitudes to climate change shows that 85% of Australians believed that (recent) climate change is a problem caused by humans.[28]. The same poll shows that 77% of Australians want coal fired power stations phased out by 2020.[28] The issue of climate change, (together with WorkChoices, the war in Iraq and rising interest rates)[29] is believed to have been a major factor behind John Howard's loss of the 2007 election. This was possibly because people were frustrated at the persistent dryness of the weather since 1997 in Melbourne and Perth and 2001 in Brisbane and severe drought for many years in much of the country. It was probably also a result of increased awareness as a result of publicity of the issue from Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth and the public protests of up to 115,000 people (total) at Walks Against Warming [30] around Australia in each of 2006 and 2007. Environmental lobby groups, while initially pleased with the the Rudd Government's ratification of the Kyoto protocol, are still extremely critical of the Rudd Government's failure to rebalance government subsidies from coal and other fossil fuels to renewable energy in the May 2008 Budget. While demographic factors could increase the proportion of greenhouse sceptics in Australia's population because they generally come from highly conservative communities with much higher fertility than the general populace.[31] and there continue to be climate sceptics [32] the dramatic decreases in polar ice caps, the declaration of polar bears as an endangered species and other effects of global warming on Australia are convincing many more people of the dangers of global warming and resultant sea level rise. That State and Federal governments have accepted that global warming from greenhouse gas emissions is a reality is shown by the establishment of bodies like the Australian Greenhouse Office [1], the recognition that coal is not a sustainable fuel for power generation without carbon capture and storage (so called "clean coal") and the establishment of feed-in tariffs in Australia and mandatory renewable energy targets. Business lobbyingThe businesses responsible for a high portion of carbon emissions refer to themselves at the Greenhouse Mafia.[33] See also
References
| |