This article is about committees of the Senate. For consideration of bills 'in committee', see Committee of the Whole The committees of the Australian Senate are committees of Senators, established by the Australian Senate, for purposes determined by that body. Parliamentary committees are essential to the operation of modern parliaments, and Australian Senate committees have for some decades been pivotal to the maintenance of government accountability to the Australian parliament, particularly through hearings to scrutinise the budget, and through public inquiries on policy questions.
History of the committeesThe existence of parliamentary committees was anticipated in the Constitution of Australia, in which section 49 makes reference to 'The powers, privileges, and immunities of the Senate and of the House of Representatives, and of the members and the committees of each House...' However, the Senate had few committees, engaged in limited activities, until 1970.[1] A number of domestic committees have operated since the establishment of the parliament, however prior to 1970 the only significant committee to be established was the Regulations and Ordinances Committee in 1932, one of the legislative scrutiny committees (see below). 1970 saw the creation of what would be regarded as the modern committee system, with a series of standing (permanent) committees established that mirrored the portfolio activities of government.[2] These reforms significantly enhanced the expertise and power of the upper house:
These reforms were also significant in that they gave to committees of the Senate the role of examining the budget (what is referred to as the estimates process or estimates hearings), which had hitherto been confined to the Senate and its committee of the whole. The role of the committees was enhanced by three subsequent developments. First, in 1982 the Scrutiny of Bills Committee was established, which, in examining all bills, played a role that complemented that of the examination of all delegated legislation by the Regulations and Ordinances committee. Second, in 1989 the Senate adopted procedures for the systematic referral of bills to committees, increasing the level of legislative scrutiny taking place within parliament.[4] Third, in 1993, the committees adopted a more extensive procedure for consideration of the budget, creating a second opportunity each year for Senators to follow up issues identified during the initial budget estimates hearings. These second hearings are referred to as supplementary budget estimates. The committee system was restructured in 1994 and again in 2006, however the range of functions remains essentially the same. Purposes of committeesThe functions of committees depend on the type of committee and on the work it is undertaking. Most of the committees are established under the Senate's Standing Orders. Standing committeesThe eight Legislative and General Purpose Standing Committees (often referred to simply as 'standing committees') are established by Standing Order 25.[5] From 1994 to September 2006 the eight standing committees were actually made up of pairs of committees – a legislation committee and a references committee. The legislation committees were responsible for scrutinising bills referred to them by the chamber; examining the government's budget and activities (in what is called the budget estimates process);[6] and for examining departmental annual reports and activities. The references committees were responsible for conducting inquiries into topics referred to them by the chamber. From 11 September 2006 each of these pairs of committees was integrated, however their functions remained unchanged. Select committeesSelect committees are temporary committees, established by the Senate to deal with particular issues. This may happen when a particular group of Senators wants to pursue an issue in depth, or there is no existing committee that is suited to addressing a particular topic. Recent select committees include ones examining the Administration of Indigenous Affairs, and Mental Health. Select committees usually examine an issue and upon reporting back to the chamber, cease to exist. One exception to this was the Senate Select Committee on Superannuation which in various guises existed for a decade.[7] Domestic committeesDomestic committees are responsible for administering aspects of the Senate's own affairs. The selection of bills committee meets each sitting fortnight to consider which of the bills coming before the Senate will be referred to committees for detailed consideration. The procedure committee considers "any matter relating to the procedures of the Senate referred to it by the Senate or by the President".[8] This committee thus regularly examines and reports back to the chamber on suggested changes to the operation of the Senate and its committees, such as what times of day the chamber will sit and what rules should govern its order of business. Established by Standing Order 18 of the Senate, the privileges committee is responsible for reporting on matters of parliamentary privilege referred to it by the Senate.[9] The protections afforded by parliamentary privilege are essential to parliament and its committees to be able to operate effectively.[10] The bulk of the work of the privileges committee's work is associated with facilitating a 'right of reply' to people adversely named in the Senate, as well as involving investigations of unauthorised disclosures of Senate committee proceedings,[11] complaints from witnesses in connection with evidence given to committees, and allegedly misleading evidence given to committees.[12] Legislative scrutiny committeesThe purpose of the scrutiny of bills committee is to assess "legislative proposals against a set of accountability standards that focus on the effect of proposed legislation on individual rights, liberties and obligations, and on parliamentary propriety".[13] The regulations and ordinances committee performs a similar task, but for all subordinate legislation. Other committeesSenators may be members of joint committees: committees jointly established by both chambers of the Australian parliament. In addition, political parties will often have parliamentary committees comprising members of the party; these committees will often have a policy focus, but are not committees of the parliament and are not bound by any of parliament's rules of procedures. List of committeesThese are the committees of the 42nd Parliament that exist within each category:
Membership and rules of committeesThe Senate's committees are formed at the commencement of each new parliament, in accordance with rules set out in the Standing Orders. The committees exist until the first day of the following parliament, in contrast to the lower house committees, which cease to exist as soon as parliament is prorogued for an election. The most important and high profile of the committees are the standing committees. These each have eight members: four drawn from amongst government Senators, three from the opposition, and one from amongst the minor parties and independents. The Chair of each committee is chosen from amongst the government members, the deputy chair from amongst non-government members. Because the Chair has a casting vote in the event of a committee vote being tied, the government effectively controls the committees. This control was a result of the reforms implemented from 11 September 2006, which were intended to streamline committee operations[14] and reflect the fact that the government secured a majority of seats in the chamber at the 2004 election.[15] Prior to this, the chairing – and control – of Senate committees had been divided amongst government and non-government parties. Under the new Standing Orders control is in the hands of the government. However, as the government is formed in the House of Representatives, the new rules mean that an opposition with a majority in the Senate would still have no control of standing committees. The membership and rules of committees before and after the reforms implemented in September 2006 are shown below:[16]
Committees have two types of members: full members and participating members. In the case of standing committees, full members are the eight outlined above. In addition, however, any Senator may arrange for the Senate to agree to their being made a participating member of the committee. This gives them the same rights as full members, with the important exception of being unable to move or vote on motions in private meetings of the committees. The committees are governed by the Standing Orders of the Senate, as well as being able to pass their own resolutions to govern certain aspects of their operations (such as the processing of correspondence and submissions to inquiries). Committees are designed to assist the Senate as a whole. Thus the main formal structure of their work is that the Senate refers something to a committee for examination, and the committee reports back to the Senate on that matter. These reports are tabled during parliamentary sittings, but can also be presented when the Senate is not in session.[17] Committees can gather evidence and will often hold public hearings to assist this process.[18] To gather their evidence committees can (with exceptions) travel from place to place to hear evidence.[19] Committees are able to order the production of documents and the appearance of witnesses (powers that are in practice used very sparingly).[20][21] Most evidence taken by committees (both written submissions and transcripts of public hearings) is published, however committees have the power to take evidence confidentially (in camera), and regularly do so.[22] Committees hold both public hearings and conduct business at private meetings. The minutes of private meetings are confidential (in contrast, for example, to those of New South Wales parliamentary committees).[23] The rules governing committees are slightly different when conducting budget estimates hearings.[24] In particular, during estimates hearings,
The work of committeesA typical year in the life of a Senate standing committee will see it conduct eight days of hearings around budget estimates, in three sessions: February (additional estimates), May/June (the main budget estimates) and October/November (supplementary budget estimates). In addition, it will typically conduct several inquiries into policy issues and into some pieces of legislation being considered by the parliament. Each of these inquiries will usually result in a report tabled in the Senate (there may be exceptions if an election intervenes during the committee's deliberations). A consolidated list of the reports prepared by all Senate committees since 1970 is published by the Department of the Senate. Committee inquiries typically begin with the reference of an issue or a proposed law to the committee for inquiry and report back to the Senate.[25] The committee will make a call for submissions, seeking public input on the matter referred to the committee. It will often publish those submissions to help inform stakeholders of the views that are being put to the committee.[26] A committee will often hold one or more public hearings, at which committee members ask questions of key stakeholders interested in the issue under inquiry. These hearings may be held anywhere in Australia, are often broadcast, and result in a published transcript (Hansard) that records the evidence taken. The opportunity to make submissions, and the greater accessibility of the committees compared to parliament itself, can provide disadvantaged individuals and organisations valued opportunities to engage in democratic processes.[27] Committees also frequently ask relevant government agencies to respond to issues raised by submissions or evidence given to the inquiry. Once evidence has been gathered there usually follows a period of research and analysis by the committee. It will then deliver a report to the Senate, which will generally include recommendations. The Commonwealth government is then expected to table a response to the report, stating responses to any recommendations the committee may have made.[28] The impact of the Senate's committees varies and has been the subject of debate. The work of the committees is frequently more consensual and less partisan than activity in the parliamentary chambers, and unanimous committee reports that agree recommendations across party lines are not uncommon.[29] As a result, these recommendations may contribute to subsequent government policy announcements and occasionally to changes in government actions. The work of the regulations and ordinances committee has led to revisions of subordinate legislation in significant respects.[30] Committee scrutiny of bills has contributed to them being amended[31] or withdrawn.[32] The impact of committees on legislation overall has however been described as 'rather limited',[33] particularly as the committees that review bills are controlled by a government majority. The work of the committees can be affected by the party composition of the Senate. The Clerk of the Senate, Harry Evans, has argued that a government majority of seats in the Senate has resulted in limitations on what the committees inquire into, and how readily governments respond to their queries and requests for information.[34] Statistics published by centrist political party the Australian Democrats have been used to support the contention that committee operations have been inhibited by government control of the Senate, particularly in respect of selection of topics for committee inquiry.[35] However Senator Minchin, the leader of the government in the Senate, pointed out that their political rivals had previously cut off debate on more bills in the Senate than had the government.[36] Prominent Senate committee inquiriesOne of the most high-profile Senate committee inquiries was the Senate Select Committee on a Certain Maritime Incident, which in 2002 investigated what became known as the Children Overboard Affair. The events and subsequent Senate committee inquiries were widely reported,[37] and the transcripts of the inquiry formed the basis of a play, A Certain Maritime Incident.[38] Other high-profile inquiries included the Community Affairs committee's inquiry into Children in Institutional Care, which brought to wide public notice the experiences of children who had been placed in care in sometimes inhumane circumstances and was directly responsible for state governments and churches making public apologies to the victims of abuse or neglect;[39][40] the Select Committee on Mental Health, which contributed to widespread discussion of mental health issues and to a major funding boost for services in 2006;[41] and the 2006 inquiry into the Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill,[42] which contributed to a government decision not to proceed with controversial migration legislation. References
Further reading
See alsoExternal links
| |